Usage / Role
46%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2016UCLA
QB • 6'2" • Cockeysville, MD, USA
Mike Fafaul is a balanced quarterback profile with 16 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
46%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
33
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
25
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
48
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UCLA
Snapshot
Player Story
Mike Fafaul built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a quarterback from Cockeysville, MD wearing No. 12, spending time with UCLA. The clearest part of Mike Fafaul's career was his passing role: 1,670...
Read the storyMike Fafaul, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UCLA. Mike Fafaul is a balanced quarterback profile with 16 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Postseason | UCLA | 2 | 20 | 29 | -9 | 0 | 49.5 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UCLA | 2 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 49.5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 1 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 49.3 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCLA | 8 | 1,593 | 1,602 | -9 | 12 | 63.2 |
Related Context
Mike Fafaul played QB for UCLA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Mike Fafaul recorded 1,670 passing yards, -18 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UCLA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UCLA paired 1,593 primary output with 53.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 53.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
199.1
Efficiency
53.1
Usage
16
Consistency
63.9
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 13. Arizona State: 34. Washington State: 260. Utah: 487. Colorado: 166. Oregon State: 285. USC: 181. California: 167
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 1 by 100. Arizona State: 13 by 22. Washington State: 42 by 50.9. Utah: 76 by 57. Colorado: 34 by 47.8. Oregon State: 49 by 53.6. USC: 32 by 49.3. California: 37 by 43.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
100 vs UNLV
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ California | L 10-36 | 12 | 30 | 176 | 40.0 | 1 | 1 | 43.9 | 7 | -9 | -1.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs USC | L 14-36 | 15 | 31 | 181 | 48.4 | 2 | 0 | 49.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Oregon State | W 38-24 | 25 | 47 | 281 | 53.2 | 0 | 1 | 53.6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 11/4 | @ Colorado | L 10-20 | 15 | 29 | 185 | 51.7 | 1 | 1 | 47.8 | 5 | -19 | -3.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Utah300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 45-52 | 40 | 70 | 464 | 57.1 | 5 | 4 | 57 | 6 | 23 | 3.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Washington State3+ TD | L 21-27 | 24 | 40 | 258 | 60.0 | 3 | 2 | 50.9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Arizona State | L 20-23 | 3 | 11 | 44 | 27.3 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 2 | -10 | -5 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs UNLV | W 42-21 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — |
Player Story
Mike Fafaul built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a quarterback from Cockeysville, MD wearing No. 12, spending time with UCLA. The clearest part of Mike Fafaul's career was his passing role: 1,670 passing yards, 12 touchdown passes, and 265 attempts across 11 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with UCLA. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 11 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across UCLA.
The arc is straightforward: Mike Fafaul moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCLA
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | UCLA | 38 | 79.2 | 8.3 | 38 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UCLA | 38 | 79.2 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | -38 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 21 | 95.8 | 0 | 21 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCLA | 1,593 | 53.1 | 16 | 1,572 |
#1 Featured game
@ Oregon State
Week 10 · W 41-0 · Conference game
Win with 21 yards of offense and 95.8 efficiency.
21
Total Offense
97.9 takeover
21 total offense with 95.8 efficiency.
#2
vs New Mexico State
Week 4 · W 59-13
18
Total Offense
86.7 takeover
Win with 18 yards of offense and 83.3 efficiency.
18 total offense with 83.3 efficiency.
#3
vs Utah
Week 8 · L 45-52 · Conference game
487
Total Offense
80.1 takeover
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
487 total offense with 57 efficiency.
#4
vs Virginia Tech
Week 1 · W 42-12 · Postseason
20
Total Offense
64.5 takeover
Win with 20 yards of offense and 75 efficiency.
20 total offense with 75 efficiency.
#5
vs UNLV
Week 2 · W 42-21
13
Total Offense
51.3 takeover
Win with 13 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
13 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
1,593 primary output · 53.1 efficiency · 16 usage
63.2
#2
2013 Postseason · UCLA
49.5
38 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 8.3 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UCLA
49.5
38 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 8.3 usage
3
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
2
3+ TD games
4
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.