Usage Score
22.2
Player Dossier
2010-2013Bowling Green
WR • 6'2" • Sylvania, OH, USA
Shaun Joplin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
22.2
Efficiency
92.8
Consistency
63.5
Season Value
69.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shaun Joplin, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Bowling Green. Shaun Joplin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Shaun Joplin played WR for Bowling Green. Across 4 tracked seasons, Shaun Joplin recorded 5 rushing yards, 1,850 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Bowling Green.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 908 primary output with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
64.9
Efficiency
92.8
Usage
22.2
Consistency
63.5
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 86. Tulsa: 40. Kent State: 113. Indiana: 104. Murray State: 53. Akron: 78. Massachusetts: 25. Mississippi State: 40. Toledo: 64. Miami (OH): 47. Ohio: 71. Eastern Michigan: 23. Buffalo: 149. Northern Illinois: 15
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 6 by 95.6. Tulsa: 2 by 100. Kent State: 6 by 100. Indiana: 7 by 99. Murray State: 3 by 100. Akron: 5 by 100. Massachusetts: 2 by 83.3. Mississippi State: 4 by 66.7. Toledo: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 4 by 78.3. Ohio: 3 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 76.7. Buffalo: 6 by 100. Northern Illinois: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/26 | vs Pittsburgh | L 27-30 | — | 6 | 86 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Northern Illinois | W 47-27 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards | W 24-7 | — | 6 | 149 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 58-7 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Wed 11/13 | vs Ohio | W 49-0 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 0 | 43 |
| Wed 11/6 | @ Miami (OH) | W 45-3 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Toledo | L 25-28 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Mississippi State | L 20-21 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Massachusetts | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Akron | W 31-14 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Murray State | W 48-7 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Indiana100 receiving yards | L 10-42 | — | 7 | 104 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Kent State100 receiving yards | W 41-22 | — | 6 | 113 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 35 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Tulsa | W 34-7 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 21 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 11 | 73.3 | 5 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 292 | 84.4 | 9.3 | 281 |
| 2012 Postseason | Bowling Green | 639 | 88.9 | 17 | 347 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 639 | 88.9 | 17 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Bowling Green | 908 | 92.8 | 22.2 | 269 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 908 | 92.8 | 22.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
149
Primary metric
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
104
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 99 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Postseason · Bowling Green
908 primary output · 92.8 efficiency · 22.2 usage
69.6
#2
2013 Regular Season · Bowling Green
69.6
908 primary · 92.8 efficiency · 22.2 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Bowling Green
61.1
639 primary · 88.9 efficiency · 17 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,850
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.