Usage Score
13.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019Wisconsin
Chris Orr
LB • 6'0" • 224 lbs • Desoto, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chris Orr shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
44.3
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
39.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Wisconsin
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Orr, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Wisconsin. Chris Orr shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 30.5 primary output with 44.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 44.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
2.2
Efficiency
44.3
Usage
13.9
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 0.5. South Florida: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Michigan: 2. Northwestern: 4. Kent State: 4. Michigan State: 3. Illinois: 6. Ohio State: 2. Iowa: 1. Nebraska: 3. Purdue: 3. Minnesota: 2. Ohio State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 6 by 30. South Florida: 5 by 20.8. Central Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Michigan: 1 by 24.2. Northwestern: 9 by 77.5. Kent State: 5 by 60.8. Michigan State: 6 by 55. Illinois: 9 by 87.5. Ohio State: 6 by 45. Iowa: 6 by 35. Nebraska: 5 by 50.8. Purdue: 9 by 67.5. Minnesota: 7 by 49.2. Ohio State: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Wins2.2 · n=10 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses2.1 · n=4 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half1.9 · n=7 · -0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half2.4 · n=7 · +0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Oregon | L 27-28 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/8 | vs Ohio State | L 21-34 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Minnesota | W 38-17 | 7 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Purdue | W 45-24 | 9 | 8 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Nebraska | W 37-21 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Iowa | W 24-22 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Ohio State | L 7-38 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Illinois2+ sacks · Splash game | L 23-24 | 9 | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Michigan State | W 38-0 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Kent State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 48-0 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Northwestern2+ sacks · Splash game | W 24-15 | 9 | 5 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Michigan | W 35-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Central Michigan | W 61-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | @ South Florida | W 49-0 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 7 | 24.4 | 6.5 | 7 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1 | 12.4 | 2.4 | -6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1 | 12.4 | 2.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Wisconsin | 30.5 | 44.3 | 13.9 | 29.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 30.5 | 44.3 | 13.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 74.3 takeover score.
#2
Miami
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.7 takeover score.
#4
Northwestern
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#5
Northwestern
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Wisconsin
30.5 primary output · 44.3 efficiency · 13.9 usage
39.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Wisconsin
39.7
30.5 primary · 44.3 efficiency · 13.9 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Wisconsin
23.1
7 primary · 24.4 efficiency · 6.5 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8261
DeSoto · DeSoto, TX
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
133
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.