Usage Score
5.4
Player Dossier
2012-2016Houston
CB • 5'11" • Shreveport, LA, USA
Brandon Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.4
Efficiency
29.9
Consistency
56.7
Season Value
48
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Wilson, CB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Houston. Brandon Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.9 disruption score.
Brandon Wilson played CB for Houston. Across 5 tracked seasons, Brandon Wilson recorded 194 rushing yards, 101 receiving yards, and 43 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Houston.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Houston paired 12 primary output with 29.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
29.9
Usage
5.4
Consistency
56.7
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 0. Oklahoma: 2. Lamar: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Tulsa: 1. SMU: 2. UCF: 3. Tulane: 0. Louisville: 2. Memphis: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma: 10 by 61.7. Lamar: 2 by 8.3. Cincinnati: 2 by 8.3. Tulsa: 5 by 30.8. SMU: 4 by 36.7. UCF: 3 by 42.5. Tulane: 6 by 25. Louisville: 5 by 40.8. Memphis: 5 by 40.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
61.7 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ San Diego State | L 10-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | @ MemphisSplash game | L 44-48 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 11/18 | vs LouisvilleSplash game | W 36-10 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Tulane | W 30-18 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs UCFSplash game | W 31-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ SMUSplash game | L 16-38 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Tulsa | W 38-31 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 9/15 | @ Cincinnati | W 40-16 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Lamar | W 42-0 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Oklahoma10+ tackles · Splash game | W 33-23 | 10 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Houston | 1 | 1.8 | — | 1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Houston | 1 | 1.8 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Houston | 12 | 29.9 | 5.4 | 11 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 12 | 29.9 | 5.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
UCF
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.5 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.2 takeover score.
#4
SMU
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.5 takeover score.
#5
Louisville
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Houston
12 primary output · 29.9 efficiency · 5.4 usage
48
#2
2016 Regular Season · Houston
48
12 primary · 29.9 efficiency · 5.4 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Houston
4.4
1 primary · 1.8 efficiency · — usage
1
Impact games
5
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
43
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.