Player Dossier

2013-2016

Oklahoma

Geno Lewis

WR • 6'1" • Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Geno Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

13.8

Efficiency

78.8

Consistency

76.5

Season Value

55.2

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Penn State

13141415151616

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Penn State • Oklahoma
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: UCF

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Geno Lewis, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Penn State. Geno Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Geno Lewis played WR for Penn State and Oklahoma. Across 4 tracked seasons, Geno Lewis recorded 32 passing yards, 1 rushing yards, and 1,569 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Penn State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Penn State paired 751 primary output with 73.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 78.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Oklahoma.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

32.3

Efficiency

78.8

Usage

13.8

Consistency

76.5

Best Game by takeover score

Texas Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 40. Houston: 18. UL Monroe: 8. Ohio State: 28. Texas: 26. Kansas State: 33. Texas Tech: 47. Kansas: 41. Iowa State: 59. Baylor: 35. West Virginia: 25. Oklahoma State: 28

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 2 by 100. Houston: 2 by 60. UL Monroe: 1 by 53.3. Ohio State: 2 by 93.3. Texas: 2 by 86.7. Kansas State: 3 by 73.3. Texas Tech: 3 by 100. Kansas: 4 by 68.3. Iowa State: 6 by 65.6. Baylor: 2 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 83.3. Oklahoma State: 3 by 62.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins34.2 · Games = 10 · +11.2 vs Losses
Losses23 · Games = 2 · -11.2 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Texas Tech

Best efficiency game

100 vs Auburn

Result
Tue 1/3vs AuburnW 35-192402020026
Sat 12/3vs Oklahoma StateW 38-203289.39.30112
Sun 11/20@ West VirginiaW 56-2822512.512.50018
Sat 11/12vs BaylorW 45-2423517.517.50029
Thu 11/3@ Iowa StateW 34-246599.89.80022
Sat 10/29vs KansasW 56-344110.310.30117
Sun 10/23@ Texas TechW 66-5934715.715.70017
Sat 10/15vs Kansas StateW 38-173331111018
Sat 10/8vs TexasW 45-402261313014
Sat 9/17vs Ohio StateL 24-452281414014
Sat 9/10vs UL MonroeW 59-17188808
Sat 9/3@ HoustonL 23-3321899014

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Penn State

    2013-2015

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Oklahoma

    2016

    Final stop

Season Value Progression

2013201420142015201520162016
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2013 Regular SeasonPenn State23459.711.8
2014 PostseasonPenn State75173.520.4517
2014 Regular SeasonPenn State75173.520.40
2015 PostseasonPenn State1966710.4-555
2015 Regular SeasonPenn State1966710.40
2016 PostseasonOklahoma38878.813.8192
2016 Regular SeasonOklahoma38878.813.80

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

UCF

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

173

Primary metric

173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Wisconsin

91

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Georgia

53

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Texas Tech

47

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Iowa State

59

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

59 receiving yards with a 65.6 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2014 Postseason · Penn State

751 primary output · 73.5 efficiency · 20.4 usage

59.5

#2

2014 Regular Season · Penn State

59.5

751 primary · 73.5 efficiency · 20.4 usage

#3

2016 Postseason · Oklahoma

55.2

388 primary · 78.8 efficiency · 13.8 usage

Milestones

2

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2012 · Rating 0.9373

Wyoming Valley West · Plymouth, PA

Committed To
Penn State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2012

Career Facts

2

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

1,569

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.