Usage Score
7.1
Player Dossier
2012-2016Akron
WR • 6'2" • Yonkers, NY, USA
Tyrell Goodman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.1
Efficiency
20
Consistency
8.3
Season Value
9.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Akron
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyrell Goodman, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Akron. Tyrell Goodman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tyrell Goodman played WR for Akron. Across 5 tracked seasons, Tyrell Goodman recorded 284 passing yards, 37 rushing yards, and 463 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Akron.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Akron paired 243 primary output with 67.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
0.8
Efficiency
20
Usage
7.1
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 3. Kent State: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Ohio: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
20 vs Wisconsin
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Akron
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Akron | 113 | 58.7 | 6.3 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Akron | 243 | 67.9 | 8.6 | 130 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | -243 |
| 2015 Postseason | Akron | 104 | 59.6 | 16.6 | 104 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Akron | 104 | 59.6 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Akron | 3 | 20 | 7.1 | -101 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Florida International
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#5
Morgan State
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · Akron
243 primary output · 67.9 efficiency · 8.6 usage
55.7
#2
2015 Postseason · Akron
45.2
104 primary · 59.6 efficiency · 16.6 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Akron
45.2
104 primary · 59.6 efficiency · 16.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
463
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.