Usage Score
10.7
Player Dossier
2012-2016UCLA
WR • 5'9" • Richmond, CA, USA
Kenneth Walker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.7
Efficiency
76.9
Consistency
30.5
Season Value
54.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · UCLA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenneth Walker, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · UCLA. Kenneth Walker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kenneth Walker played WR for UCLA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Kenneth Walker recorded 11 rushing yards, 782 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UCLA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
UCLA paired 127 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
36.5
Efficiency
76.9
Usage
10.7
Consistency
30.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 115. UNLV: 7. BYU: 25. Stanford: 38. Arizona: 114. Arizona State: 25. Washington State: 20. Utah: 14. Oregon State: 0. California: 7
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 6 by 100. UNLV: 1 by 46.7. BYU: 2 by 83.3. Stanford: 2 by 100. Arizona: 4 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 55.6. Washington State: 2 by 66.7. Utah: 1 by 93.3. California: 1 by 46.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ California | L 10-36 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Oregon State | W 38-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Utah | L 45-52 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Washington State | L 21-27 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Arizona State | L 20-23 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Arizona100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 4 | 114 | 24.4 | 28.50 | 2 | 62 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Stanford | L 13-22 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ BYU | W 17-14 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs UNLV | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards | L 24-31 | — | 6 | 115 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 1 | 62 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCLA
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | UCLA | 59 | 35.4 | 7.5 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | UCLA | 59 | 35.4 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | -59 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UCLA | 127 | 100 | 5 | 127 |
| 2015 Postseason | UCLA | 231 | 84.8 | 6.1 | 104 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 231 | 84.8 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCLA | 365 | 76.9 | 10.7 | 134 |
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Regular Season · UCLA
127 primary output · 100 efficiency · 5 usage
59.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
54.5
365 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 10.7 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · UCLA
46
231 primary · 84.8 efficiency · 6.1 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8478
Richmond · Rockingham, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
782
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.