Usage Score
14.6
Player Dossier
2010-2014Akron
L.T. Smith
WR • 6'0" • Painesville, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
L.T. Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.6
Consistency
40.6
Season Value
55.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Akron
1011121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Akron
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
L.T. Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Akron. L.T. Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Akron paired 509 primary output with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Akron
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
40.8
Efficiency
70.6
Usage
14.6
Consistency
40.6
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 74. Penn State: 27. Marshall: 23. Pittsburgh: 15. Eastern Michigan: 117. Miami (OH): 4. Ohio: 22. Ball State: 59. Bowling Green: 80. Buffalo: 9. Massachusetts: 39. Kent State: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 98.7. Penn State: 2 by 90. Marshall: 4 by 38.3. Pittsburgh: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 10 by 78. Miami (OH): 1 by 26.7. Ohio: 2 by 73.3. Ball State: 5 by 78.7. Bowling Green: 9 by 59.3. Buffalo: 1 by 60. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. Kent State: 3 by 44.4
Split Comparison
Wins43.8 · n=4 · +9.5 vs Losses
Losses34.3 · n=7 · -9.5 vs Wins
First Half43.3 · n=6 · +5.2 vs Second Half
Second Half38.2 · n=6 · -5.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | @ Kent State | L 24-27 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Wed 11/19 | vs Massachusetts | W 30-6 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Wed 11/12 | @ Buffalo | L 24-55 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Wed 11/5 | vs Bowling GreenHigh volume | L 10-27 | — | 9 | 80 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Ball State | L 21-35 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Ohio | L 20-23 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Miami (OH) | W 29-19 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-6 | — | 10 | 117 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Pittsburgh | W 21-10 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Marshall | L 17-48 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Penn State | L 3-21 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 57 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Akron
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20102011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Akron | 509 | 68.6 | 13.4 | 509 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Akron | 428 | 95.6 | 13.9 | -81 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Akron | 489 | 70.6 | 14.6 | 61 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 78 efficiency score.
#3
UCF
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 82.9 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Akron
509 primary output · 68.6 efficiency · 13.4 usage
62.2
#2
2013 Regular Season · Akron
60.4
428 primary · 95.6 efficiency · 13.9 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Akron
55.3
489 primary · 70.6 efficiency · 14.6 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2010 · Rating 0.7889
Riverside · Painesville, OH
- Committed To
- Akron
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,426
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.