Usage / Role
24%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2010-2014Akron
WR • 6'0" • Painesville, OH, USA
L.T. Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
24%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
46
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
35
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
65
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Akron
Snapshot
Player Story
L.T. Smith built his college career from 2010 through 2014 as a wide receiver from Painesville, OH wearing No. 3, spending time with Akron. The clearest part of L.T. Smith's career was his receiving role: 117...
Read the storyL.T. Smith, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Akron. L.T. Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | Akron | 12 | 48 | 509 | 3 | 70.3 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Akron | 10 | 24 | 428 | 3 | 68.7 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Akron | 12 | 45 | 489 | 3 | 64 |
Related Context
L.T. Smith played WR for Akron. Across 5 tracked seasons, L.T. Smith recorded 1,426 receiving yards and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Akron.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Akron paired 509 primary output with 68.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
40.8
Efficiency
70.6
Usage
14.6
Consistency
40.6
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Howard: 74. Penn State: 27. Marshall: 23. Pittsburgh: 15. Eastern Michigan: 117. Miami (OH): 4. Ohio: 22. Ball State: 59. Bowling Green: 80. Buffalo: 9. Massachusetts: 39. Kent State: 20
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Howard: 5 by 98.7. Penn State: 2 by 90. Marshall: 4 by 38.3. Pittsburgh: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 10 by 78. Miami (OH): 1 by 26.7. Ohio: 2 by 73.3. Ball State: 5 by 78.7. Bowling Green: 9 by 59.3. Buffalo: 1 by 60. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. Kent State: 3 by 44.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | @ Kent State | L 24-27 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Wed 11/19 | vs Massachusetts | W 30-6 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Wed 11/12 | @ Buffalo | L 24-55 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Wed 11/5 | vs Bowling GreenHigh volume | L 10-27 | — | 9 | 80 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Ball State | L 21-35 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Ohio | L 20-23 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Miami (OH) | W 29-19 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-6 | — | 10 | 117 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Pittsburgh | W 21-10 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Marshall | L 17-48 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Penn State | L 3-21 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Howard | W 41-0 | — | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 57 |
Player Story
L.T. Smith built his college career from 2010 through 2014 as a wide receiver from Painesville, OH wearing No. 3, spending time with Akron. The clearest part of L.T. Smith's career was his receiving role: 117 catches, 1,426 receiving yards, and 9 touchdowns across 34 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2014 with Akron. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 623 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 34 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Akron.
The arc is straightforward: L.T. Smith moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Akron
2010-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Akron | 509 | 68.6 | 13.4 | 509 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Akron | 428 | 95.6 | 13.9 | -81 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Akron | 489 | 70.6 | 14.6 | 61 |
#1 Featured game
vs Eastern Michigan
Week 6 · W 31-6 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117
Receiving Yards
92.7 takeover
117 receiving yards with a 78 efficiency score.
#2
@ Michigan
Week 3 · L 24-28
125
Receiving Yards
88.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs UCF
Week 1 · L 14-56
87
Receiving Yards
86.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 82.9 efficiency score.
#4
@ Bowling Green
Week 5 · L 14-31 · Conference game
89
Receiving Yards
82.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Toledo
Week 13 · L 23-35 · Conference game
79
Receiving Yards
78.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Akron
509 primary output · 68.6 efficiency · 13.4 usage
70.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · Akron
68.7
428 primary · 95.6 efficiency · 13.9 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Akron
64
489 primary · 70.6 efficiency · 14.6 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.