Usage Score
26.2
Player Dossier
2011-2015Cincinnati
WR • 5'9" • Maple Hts., OH, USA
Shaq Washington reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
26.2
Efficiency
71.1
Consistency
71.8
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shaq Washington, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati. Shaq Washington reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Shaq Washington played WR for Cincinnati. Across 5 tracked seasons, Shaq Washington recorded 71 passing yards, 91 rushing yards, and 2,563 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Cincinnati.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 982 primary output with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.5
Efficiency
71.1
Usage
26.2
Consistency
71.8
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 11. Alabama A&M: 69. Temple: 53. Miami (OH): 44. Memphis: 120. Miami: 106. BYU: 103. UConn: 78. UCF: 72. Houston: 59. Tulsa: 91. South Florida: 52. East Carolina: 124
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 2 by 36.7. Alabama A&M: 7 by 65.7. Temple: 6 by 58.9. Miami (OH): 4 by 73.3. Memphis: 9 by 88.9. Miami: 8 by 88.3. BYU: 5 by 100. UConn: 8 by 65. UCF: 8 by 60. Houston: 4 by 98.3. Tulsa: 8 by 75.8. South Florida: 6 by 57.8. East Carolina: 15 by 55.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
100 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/25 | vs San Diego State | L 7-42 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 19-16 | — | 15 | 124 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ South Florida | L 27-65 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs TulsaHigh volume | W 49-38 | — | 8 | 91 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Houston | L 30-33 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs UCFHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 52-7 | — | 8 | 72 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs UConnHigh volume | W 37-13 | — | 8 | 78 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ BYU100 receiving yards | L 24-38 | — | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 0 | 46 |
| Thu 10/1 | vs Miami100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-23 | — | 8 | 106 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Thu 9/24 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 46-53 | — | 9 | 120 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-33 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Temple | L 26-34 | — | 6 | 53 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 13 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Alabama A&M | W 52-10 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 14 | 25 | 11.3 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 23 | 51.1 | 15 | 9 |
| 2013 Postseason | Cincinnati | 783 | 64.7 | 23.6 | 760 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 783 | 64.7 | 23.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Cincinnati | 761 | 70.8 | 22.5 | -22 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 761 | 70.8 | 22.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Cincinnati | 982 | 71.1 | 26.2 | 221 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 982 | 71.1 | 26.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
163
Primary metric
163 receiving yards with a 90.6 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
BYU
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
982 primary output · 71.1 efficiency · 26.2 usage
67.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Cincinnati
67.3
982 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 26.2 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Cincinnati
57.9
761 primary · 70.8 efficiency · 22.5 usage
8
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,563
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.