Usage Score
15.9
Player Dossier
2011-2015Cincinnati
WR • 6'1" • Kenton, OH, USA
Max Morrison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.9
Efficiency
69.7
Consistency
51.8
Season Value
59.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Max Morrison, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Cincinnati. Max Morrison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Max Morrison played WR for Cincinnati. Across 5 tracked seasons, Max Morrison recorded 3 rushing yards, 1,522 receiving yards, and 10 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Cincinnati.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 617 primary output with 69.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.5
Efficiency
69.7
Usage
15.9
Consistency
51.8
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 84. Alabama A&M: 48. Temple: 54. Miami (OH): 26. Memphis: 162. Miami: 61. BYU: 31. UConn: 22. UCF: -1. Houston: 47. Tulsa: 40. South Florida: 11. East Carolina: 32
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 7 by 80. Alabama A&M: 3 by 100. Temple: 4 by 90. Miami (OH): 3 by 57.8. Memphis: 9 by 100. Miami: 5 by 81.3. BYU: 4 by 51.7. UConn: 2 by 73.3. UCF: 2 by 0. Houston: 4 by 78.3. Tulsa: 4 by 66.7. South Florida: 1 by 73.3. East Carolina: 4 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/25 | vs San Diego State | L 7-42 | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ East Carolina | W 19-16 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ South Florida | L 27-65 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Tulsa | W 49-38 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Houston | L 30-33 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs UCF | W 52-7 | — | 2 | -1 | -0.5 | -0.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs UConn | W 37-13 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ BYU | L 24-38 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 10/1 | vs Miami | W 34-23 | — | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 38 |
| Thu 9/24 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 46-53 | — | 9 | 162 | 18 | 18 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-33 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Temple | L 26-34 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Alabama A&M | W 52-10 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 35 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Cincinnati | 447 | 85.7 | 9.7 | 447 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 447 | 85.7 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Cincinnati | 458 | 65.2 | 16.2 | 11 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 458 | 65.2 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Cincinnati | 617 | 69.7 | 15.9 | 159 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 617 | 69.7 | 15.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162
Primary metric
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Northwestern State
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Purdue
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulane
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 76 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Cincinnati
617 primary output · 69.7 efficiency · 15.9 usage
59.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Cincinnati
59.3
617 primary · 69.7 efficiency · 15.9 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Cincinnati
57.7
447 primary · 85.7 efficiency · 9.7 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,522
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.