Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025Toledo
Emmanuel McNeil-Warren
S • 6'2" • 202 lbs • Saint Petersburg, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Emmanuel McNeil-Warren shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.1
Consistency
53.3
Season Value
28.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Toledo
222323242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Toledo. Emmanuel McNeil-Warren shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Toledo paired 0 primary output with 6.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
35.1
Usage
8.4
Consistency
53.3
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 1. Kentucky: 0. Western Kentucky: 3. Unknown: 0. Western Michigan: 1. Akron: 0.5. Bowling Green: 1. Kent State: 0. Washington State: 0. Northern Illinois: 1. Miami (OH): 1.5. Ball State: 2. Central Michigan: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 4 by 26.7. Kentucky: 11 by 45.8. Western Kentucky: 2 by 38.3. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Western Michigan: 8 by 43.3. Akron: 5 by 25.8. Bowling Green: 5 by 30.8. Kent State: 5 by 20.8. Washington State: 13 by 50. Northern Illinois: 5 by 30.8. Miami (OH): 4 by 31.7. Ball State: 8 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 6 by 55
Split Comparison
Wins1.6 · n=7 · +1.0 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · n=5 · -1.0 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
55 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/23 | @ Louisville | L 22-27 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Central Michigan | W 21-3 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Ball StateSplash game | W 38-9 | 8 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/13 | @ Miami (OH) | W 24-3 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/6 | vs Northern Illinois | W 42-3 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Washington State10+ tackles | L 7-28 | 13 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Kent State | W 45-10 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Bowling Green | L 23-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Akron | W 45-3 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Western Michigan | L 13-14 | 8 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Western KentuckySplash game | W 45-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Kentucky10+ tackles | L 16-24 | 11 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | 6.3 | 1 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Toledo | 9 | 26.4 | 6.2 | 9 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Toledo | 9 | 26.4 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Toledo | 7 | 39.5 | 8 | -2 |
| 2025 Postseason | Toledo | 14 | 35.1 | 8.4 | 7 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Toledo | 14 | 35.1 | 8.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 64.2 takeover score.
#2
Massachusetts
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.9 takeover score.
#3
Western Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.4 takeover score.
#4
Central Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
#5
Western Kentucky
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Toledo
0 primary output · 6.3 efficiency · 1 usage
35.8
#2
2025 Postseason · Toledo
28.8
14 primary · 35.1 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Toledo
28.8
14 primary · 35.1 efficiency · 8.4 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
6
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8467
Lakewood · St. Petersburg, FL
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
212
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.