Usage Score
21.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Western Kentucky
WR • 5'8" • 180 lbs • Hamilton, GA, USA
K.D. Hutchinson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.2
Efficiency
61.5
Consistency
59.2
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Western Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
K.D. Hutchinson, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Western Kentucky. K.D. Hutchinson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
K.D. Hutchinson played WR for Western Kentucky. Across 4 tracked seasons, K.D. Hutchinson recorded 161 rushing yards, 1,240 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Western Kentucky.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Western Kentucky paired 618 primary output with 61.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 61.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.5
Efficiency
61.5
Usage
21.2
Consistency
59.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: -1. North Alabama: 113. Sam Houston: 34. Toledo: 37. Nevada: 18. Missouri State: 44. Delaware: 58. Florida International: 26. Louisiana Tech: 77. New Mexico State: 83. Middle Tennessee: 52. LSU: 40. Jacksonville State: 37
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 5 by 0. North Alabama: 5 by 100. Sam Houston: 4 by 56.7. Toledo: 3 by 82.2. Nevada: 2 by 60. Missouri State: 3 by 97.8. Delaware: 9 by 43. Florida International: 4 by 43.3. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 85.6. New Mexico State: 7 by 79. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 69.3. LSU: 8 by 33.3. Jacksonville State: 5 by 49.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/23 | @ Southern Miss | W 27-16 | — | 5 | -1 | -0.2 | -0.20 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Jacksonville State | L 34-37 | — | 5 | 37 | 6.6 | 7.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ LSUHigh volume | L 10-13 | — | 8 | 40 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 42-26 | — | 5 | 52 | 11.7 | 10.40 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs New Mexico State | W 35-16 | — | 7 | 83 | 11 | 11.90 | 0 | 38 |
| Tue 10/21 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-27 | — | 6 | 77 | 10.4 | 12.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Wed 10/15 | vs Florida International | L 6-25 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.4 | 6.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 10/3 | @ DelawareHigh volume | W 27-24 | — | 9 | 58 | 6.3 | 6.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Missouri State | W 27-22 | — | 3 | 44 | 12.8 | 14.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Nevada | W 31-16 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Toledo | L 21-45 | — | 3 | 37 | 12 | 12.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs North Alabama100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 55-6 | — | 5 | 113 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 2 | 78 |
| Sat 8/23 | vs Sam Houston | W 41-24 | — | 4 | 34 | 6.6 | 8.50 | 1 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Western Kentucky
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 48 | 64 | 13.5 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 182 | 56.1 | 6.5 | 134 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 182 | 56.1 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 392 | 65.7 | 11.1 | 210 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 392 | 65.7 | 11.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 618 | 61.5 | 21.2 | 226 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 618 | 61.5 | 21.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
North Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Sam Houston
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico State
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Jacksonville State
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Western Kentucky
618 primary output · 61.5 efficiency · 21.2 usage
60.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
60.5
618 primary · 61.5 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Western Kentucky
46.4
392 primary · 65.7 efficiency · 11.1 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,240
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.