Usage Score
13.4
Player Dossier
2019-2022Clemson
Joseph Ngata
WR • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Folsom, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Joseph Ngata reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.2
Consistency
61.1
Season Value
63.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Clemson
191920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joseph Ngata, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Clemson. Joseph Ngata reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Clemson paired 438 primary output with 97.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Clemson
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
37.6
Efficiency
79.2
Usage
13.4
Consistency
61.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 84. Georgia Tech: 7. Unknown: 44. Louisiana Tech: 54. Wake Forest: 84. NC State: 19. Boston College: 47. Florida State: 19. Syracuse: 50. Notre Dame: 22. Louisville: 30. Miami: 13. South Carolina: 7. North Carolina: 46
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 8 by 70. Georgia Tech: 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 3 by 97.8. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 100. Wake Forest: 4 by 100. NC State: 2 by 63.3. Boston College: 3 by 100. Florida State: 1 by 100. Syracuse: 3 by 100. Notre Dame: 4 by 36.7. Louisville: 2 by 100. Miami: 1 by 86.7. South Carolina: 1 by 46.7. North Carolina: 5 by 61.3
Split Comparison
Wins36.9 · n=10 · -0.8 vs Losses
Losses37.7 · n=3 · +0.8 vs Wins
First Half48.4 · n=7 · +21.7 vs Second Half
Second Half26.7 · n=7 · -21.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | vs TennesseeHigh volume | L 14-31 | — | 8 | 84 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 12/4 | @ North Carolina | W 39-10 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs South Carolina | L 30-31 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Miami | W 40-10 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisville | W 31-16 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-35 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Syracuse | W 27-21 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida State | W 34-28 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Boston College | W 31-3 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs NC State | W 30-20 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Wake Forest | W 51-45 | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 46 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 48-20 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Tue 9/6 | @ Georgia Tech | W 41-10 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Clemson | 240 | 75.3 | 7.9 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Clemson | 240 | 75.3 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Clemson | 83 | 70.8 | 6.2 | -157 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Clemson | 438 | 97.9 | 16.8 | 355 |
| 2022 Postseason | Clemson | 526 | 79.2 | 13.4 | 88 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Clemson | 526 | 79.2 | 13.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
110
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Charlotte
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Wake Forest
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Clemson
438 primary output · 97.9 efficiency · 16.8 usage
67.3
#2
2022 Postseason · Clemson
63.4
526 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Clemson
63.4
526 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 13.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,287
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.