Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2018-2020Washington State
Rodrick Fisher
WR • 6'2" • 195 lbs • Spokane Valley, WA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Rodrick Fisher reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.6
Consistency
50.7
Season Value
56.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Washington State
18191920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Washington State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rodrick Fisher, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Washington State. Rodrick Fisher reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Rodrick Fisher played WR for Washington State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Rodrick Fisher recorded 277 receiving yards, 3 tackles, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Washington State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Washington State paired 265 primary output with 70.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Washington State
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
26.5
Efficiency
70.6
Usage
6.7
Consistency
50.7
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 0. New Mexico State: 66. Unknown: 36. Houston: 7. UCLA: 71. Utah: 31. Arizona State: 29. Colorado: 21. California: 4. Oregon State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 3 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 80. Houston: 1 by 46.7. UCLA: 3 by 100. Utah: 5 by 41.3. Arizona State: 1 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 70. California: 1 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins23.5 · Games = 4 · -3.5 vs Losses
Losses27 · Games = 5 · +3.5 vs Wins
First Half36 · Games = 5 · +19 vs Second Half
Second Half17 · Games = 5 · -19 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Air Force | L 21-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Oregon State | W 54-53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/10 | @ California | L 20-33 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Colorado | W 41-10 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Arizona State | L 34-38 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Utah | L 13-38 | — | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs UCLA | L 63-67 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 0 | 58 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Houston | W 31-24 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs New Mexico State | W 58-7 | — | 3 | 66 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2018-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201920192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Washington State | 12 | 80 | 1.9 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Washington State | 265 | 70.6 | 6.7 | 253 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Washington State | 265 | 70.6 | 6.7 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Washington State | 0 | — | — | -265 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico State
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
12
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Arizona State
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
36
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Washington State
265 primary output · 70.6 efficiency · 6.7 usage
56.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Washington State
56.7
265 primary · 70.6 efficiency · 6.7 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Washington State
24.4
12 primary · 80 efficiency · 1.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8947
East Valley · Spokane, WA
- Committed To
- Washington State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
277
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.