Usage Score
25
Player Dossier
2017-2019Michigan State
Cody White
WR • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Novi, MI, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Cody White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84
Consistency
72.2
Season Value
70.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Michigan State
171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cody White, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Michigan State. Cody White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Michigan State paired 922 primary output with 84 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Michigan State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
70.9
Efficiency
84
Usage
25
Consistency
72.2
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 97. Tulsa: 18. Western Michigan: 63. Arizona State: 39. Northwestern: 70. Indiana: 67. Ohio State: 42. Wisconsin: 34. Penn State: 66. Illinois: 128. Michigan: 78. Rutgers: 136. Maryland: 84
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 8 by 80.8. Tulsa: 2 by 60. Western Michigan: 5 by 84. Arizona State: 5 by 52. Northwestern: 4 by 100. Indiana: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 4 by 70. Wisconsin: 3 by 75.6. Penn State: 3 by 100. Illinois: 7 by 100. Michigan: 6 by 86.7. Rutgers: 11 by 82.4. Maryland: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins76.4 · n=7 · +11.9 vs Losses
Losses64.5 · n=6 · -11.9 vs Wins
First Half56.6 · n=7 · -31.1 vs Second Half
Second Half87.7 · n=6 · +31.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | @ Wake ForestHigh volume | W 27-21 | — | 8 | 97 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Maryland | W 19-16 | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Rutgers100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-0 | — | 11 | 136 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 3 | 21 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Michigan | L 10-44 | — | 6 | 78 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Illinois100 receiving yards | L 34-37 | — | 7 | 128 | 15.6 | 18.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Penn State | L 7-28 | — | 3 | 66 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-38 | — | 3 | 34 | 8.5 | 11.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Ohio State | L 10-34 | — | 4 | 42 | 8.3 | 10.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Indiana | W 40-31 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Northwestern | W 31-10 | — | 4 | 70 | 16.6 | 17.50 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Arizona State | L 7-10 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Michigan | W 51-17 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Tulsa | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 18 | 7.3 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 490 | 76.5 | 16.4 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 490 | 76.5 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan State | 555 | 80.4 | 24.4 | 65 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 555 | 80.4 | 24.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan State | 922 | 84 | 25 | 367 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 922 | 84 | 25 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 95.8 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 82.4 efficiency score.
#3
Illinois
128
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
165
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 83.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Michigan State
922 primary output · 84 efficiency · 25 usage
70.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
70.3
922 primary · 84 efficiency · 25 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Michigan State
59.1
555 primary · 80.4 efficiency · 24.4 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8878
Walled Lake Western · Walled Lake, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,967
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.