Usage Score
25
Player Dossier
2017-2019Michigan State
WR • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Novi, MI, USA
Cody White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25
Efficiency
84
Consistency
72.2
Season Value
70.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cody White, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Michigan State. Cody White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Cody White played WR for Michigan State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Cody White recorded 6 passing yards, 63 rushing yards, and 1,967 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Michigan State paired 922 primary output with 84 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
70.9
Efficiency
84
Usage
25
Consistency
72.2
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 97. Tulsa: 18. Western Michigan: 63. Arizona State: 39. Northwestern: 70. Indiana: 67. Ohio State: 42. Wisconsin: 34. Penn State: 66. Illinois: 128. Michigan: 78. Rutgers: 136. Maryland: 84
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 8 by 80.8. Tulsa: 2 by 60. Western Michigan: 5 by 84. Arizona State: 5 by 52. Northwestern: 4 by 100. Indiana: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 4 by 70. Wisconsin: 3 by 75.6. Penn State: 3 by 100. Illinois: 7 by 100. Michigan: 6 by 86.7. Rutgers: 11 by 82.4. Maryland: 4 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | @ Wake ForestHigh volume | W 27-21 | — | 8 | 97 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Maryland | W 19-16 | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Rutgers100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-0 | — | 11 | 136 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 3 | 21 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Michigan | L 10-44 | — | 6 | 78 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Illinois100 receiving yards | L 34-37 | — | 7 | 128 | 15.6 | 18.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Penn State | L 7-28 | — | 3 | 66 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-38 | — | 3 | 34 | 8.5 | 11.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Ohio State | L 10-34 | — | 4 | 42 | 8.3 | 10.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Indiana | W 40-31 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Northwestern | W 31-10 | — | 4 | 70 | 16.6 | 17.50 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Arizona State | L 7-10 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Michigan | W 51-17 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Tulsa | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 18 | 7.3 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 490 | 76.5 | 16.4 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 490 | 76.5 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan State | 555 | 80.4 | 24.4 | 65 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 555 | 80.4 | 24.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan State | 922 | 84 | 25 | 367 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 922 | 84 | 25 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 95.8 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 82.4 efficiency score.
#3
Illinois
128
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
165
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 83.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Michigan State
922 primary output · 84 efficiency · 25 usage
70.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
70.3
922 primary · 84 efficiency · 25 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Michigan State
59.1
555 primary · 80.4 efficiency · 24.4 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8878
Walled Lake Western · Walled Lake, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,967
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.