Usage Score
12.4
Player Dossier
2015-2021Pittsburgh
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Brooklyn, NY, USA
Taysir Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.4
Efficiency
81.5
Consistency
54.1
Season Value
52.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Taysir Mack, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Taysir Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Taysir Mack played WR for Indiana and Pittsburgh. Across 7 tracked seasons, Taysir Mack recorded 4 rushing yards, 2,369 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 736 primary output with 71.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Indiana, Pittsburgh.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
57.6
Efficiency
81.5
Usage
12.4
Consistency
54.1
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Massachusetts: 34. Tennessee: 100. Western Michigan: 23. New Hampshire: 26. Georgia Tech: 121. Virginia Tech: 6. Clemson: 59. Miami: 92
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Massachusetts: 3 by 75.6. Tennessee: 4 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 76.7. New Hampshire: 2 by 86.7. Georgia Tech: 5 by 100. Virginia Tech: 3 by 13.3. Clemson: 3 by 100. Miami: 5 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/30 | vs Miami | L 34-38 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Clemson | W 27-17 | — | 3 | 59 | 15.8 | 19.70 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Virginia Tech | W 28-7 | — | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Georgia Tech100 receiving yards | W 52-21 | — | 5 | 121 | 24.2 | 24.20 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs New Hampshire | W 77-7 | — | 2 | 26 | 11.3 | 13 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Western Michigan | L 41-44 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Tennessee100 receiving yards | W 41-34 | — | 4 | 100 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Massachusetts | W 51-7 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 16 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Indiana
2015-2017
Opening stop
Pittsburgh
2018-2021
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Indiana | 310 | 67 | 12.9 | 310 |
| 2018 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 557 | 93.1 | 19.6 | 247 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 557 | 93.1 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 736 | 71.5 | 21.9 | 179 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 736 | 71.5 | 21.9 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 305 | 73.5 | 13.4 | -431 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 461 | 81.5 | 12.4 | 156 |
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132
Primary metric
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Delaware
124
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia Tech
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia Tech
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Boston College
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh
736 primary output · 71.5 efficiency · 21.9 usage
62.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
62.9
736 primary · 71.5 efficiency · 21.9 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Pittsburgh
62.3
557 primary · 93.1 efficiency · 19.6 usage
7
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,369
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.