Usage Score
17.6
Player Dossier
2017-2021Kansas State
QB • 6'2" • 223 lbs • Independence, MO, USA
Skylar Thompson is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
17.6
Efficiency
62.3
Consistency
78.8
Season Value
59.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Kansas State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Skylar Thompson, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Kansas State. Skylar Thompson is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Skylar Thompson played QB for Kansas State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Skylar Thompson recorded 7,131 passing yards, 1,087 rushing yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Kansas State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Kansas State paired 2,712 primary output with 64.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 62.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Win with 300 yards of offense and 66.3 efficiency. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
211.7
Efficiency
62.3
Usage
17.6
Consistency
78.8
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 269. Stanford: 177. Southern Illinois: 96. Oklahoma: 311. Iowa State: 195. Texas Tech: 300. TCU: 260. Kansas: 225. West Virginia: 150. Baylor: 134
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 33 by 68. Stanford: 24 by 63.6. Southern Illinois: 4 by 58.3. Oklahoma: 42 by 58.9. Iowa State: 30 by 55.6. Texas Tech: 37 by 66.3. TCU: 26 by 68.7. Kansas: 26 by 66. West Virginia: 22 by 68.6. Baylor: 36 by 49.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
68.7 vs TCU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/5 | vs LSU3+ TD | W 42-20 | 21 | 28 | 259 | 75.0 | 3 | 0 | 68 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Baylor | L 10-20 | 15 | 29 | 158 | 51.7 | 0 | 0 | 49.3 | 7 | -24 | -3.40 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs West Virginia | W 34-17 | 14 | 19 | 138 | 73.7 | 1 | 0 | 68.6 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Kansas | W 35-10 | 19 | 24 | 244 | 79.2 | 1 | 0 | 66 | 2 | -19 | -9.50 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs TCU | W 31-12 | 13 | 21 | 242 | 61.9 | 1 | 1 | 68.7 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Texas Tech300-yard game | W 25-24 | 24 | 30 | 306 | 80.0 | 1 | 0 | 66.3 | 7 | -6 | -0.90 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Iowa State3+ TD | L 20-33 | 15 | 23 | 206 | 65.2 | 2 | 1 | 55.6 | 7 | -11 | -1.60 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Oklahoma300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 31-37 | 29 | 41 | 320 | 70.7 | 3 | 0 | 58.9 | 1 | -9 | -9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Southern Illinois | W 31-23 | 3 | 4 | 96 | 75.0 | 0 | 1 | 58.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Stanford | W 24-7 | 9 | 14 | 144 | 64.3 | 0 | 1 | 63.6 | 10 | 33 | 3.30 | 2 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kansas State
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Kansas State | 956 | 65.1 | 21 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kansas State | 956 | 65.1 | 21 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,769 | 59.4 | 22.9 | 813 |
| 2019 Postseason | Kansas State | 2,712 | 64.3 | 22.5 | 943 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Kansas State | 2,712 | 64.3 | 22.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Kansas State | 664 | 64.5 | 19.9 | -2,048 |
| 2021 Postseason | Kansas State | 2,117 | 62.3 | 17.6 | 1,453 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Kansas State | 2,117 | 62.3 | 17.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
297
Primary metric
297 total offense with 82.9 efficiency.
#2
UTSA
279
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
279 total offense with 79.5 efficiency.
#3
Oklahoma
344
Primary metric
Win with 344 yards of offense and 70.8 efficiency.
344 total offense with 70.8 efficiency.
#4
West Virginia
318
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
318 total offense with 54.6 efficiency.
#5
Texas Tech
300
Primary metric
Win with 300 yards of offense and 66.3 efficiency.
300 total offense with 66.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Kansas State
2,712 primary output · 64.3 efficiency · 22.5 usage
66.5
#2
2019 Regular Season · Kansas State
66.5
2,712 primary · 64.3 efficiency · 22.5 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Kansas State
59.2
2,117 primary · 62.3 efficiency · 17.6 usage
7
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
10
3+ TD games
27
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8809
Fort Osage · Independence, MO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
8,218
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.