Usage Score
16
Player Dossier
2014-2018Wisconsin
T.J. Edwards
ILB • 6'1" • 248 lbs • Lake Villa, IL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
T.J. Edwards shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 45.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
45.1
Consistency
41
Season Value
30
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Wisconsin
1415161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
T.J. Edwards, ILB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Wisconsin. T.J. Edwards shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 45.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 18.5 primary output with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
45.1
Usage
16
Consistency
41
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 1. Western Kentucky: 1. New Mexico: 0. BYU: 1.5. Iowa: 2. Nebraska: 4. Michigan: 4. Illinois: 1. Northwestern: 0. Rutgers: 2. Penn State: 0. Purdue: 2. Minnesota: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 7 by 39.2. New Mexico: 4 by 16.7. BYU: 3 by 27.5. Iowa: 5 by 40.8. Nebraska: 7 by 69.2. Michigan: 10 by 81.7. Illinois: 5 by 30.8. Northwestern: 13 by 50. Rutgers: 7 by 49.2. Penn State: 14 by 50. Purdue: 10 by 61.7. Minnesota: 18 by 50
Split Comparison
Wins1.6 · n=8 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · n=5 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half1.9 · n=7 · +1.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=6 · -1.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
81.7 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | vs Miami | W 35-3 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Minnesota10+ tackles | L 15-37 | 18 | 12 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Purdue10+ tackles · Splash game | W 47-44 | 10 | 9 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Penn State10+ tackles | L 10-22 | 14 | 12 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Rutgers | W 31-17 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Northwestern10+ tackles | L 17-31 | 13 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Illinois | W 49-20 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Michigan10+ tackles · Splash game | L 13-38 | 10 | 6 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Nebraska2+ sacks · Splash game | W 41-24 | 7 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/23 | @ IowaSplash game | W 28-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs BYU | L 21-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs New Mexico | W 45-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Western Kentucky | W 34-3 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 16.5 | 41.2 | 12.7 | 16.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 16.5 | 41.2 | 12.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wisconsin | 24 | 41.3 | 11.4 | 7.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 24 | 41.3 | 11.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wisconsin | 18.5 | 45.1 | 16 | -5.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 18.5 | 45.1 | 16 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 73.2 takeover score.
#2
Michigan
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 68.9 takeover score.
#3
Nebraska
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 68.2 takeover score.
#4
Northwestern
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.6 takeover score.
#5
Utah State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Wisconsin
18.5 primary output · 45.1 efficiency · 16 usage
30
#2
2018 Regular Season · Wisconsin
30
18.5 primary · 45.1 efficiency · 16 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Wisconsin
29.1
24 primary · 41.3 efficiency · 11.4 usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
11
Splash games
10
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7878
Lakes Community · Lake Villa, IL
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
273
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.