Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2007-2009Houston
Chaz Rodriguez
WR • 6'2" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chaz Rodriguez reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
59
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Houston
0708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chaz Rodriguez, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Houston. Chaz Rodriguez reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Chaz Rodriguez played WR for Houston. Across 3 tracked seasons, Chaz Rodriguez recorded 975 receiving yards and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Houston.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Houston paired 524 primary output with 76 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Houston
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
40.3
Efficiency
76
Usage
8.4
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 14. Northwestern State: 31. Oklahoma State: 6. UTEP: 63. Mississippi State: 52. Tulane: 84. SMU: 4. Southern Miss: 30. Tulsa: 28. UCF: 23. Memphis: 98. Rice: 53. East Carolina: 38
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 1 by 93.3. Northwestern State: 2 by 100. Oklahoma State: 1 by 40. UTEP: 7 by 60. Mississippi State: 2 by 100. Tulane: 6 by 93.3. SMU: 2 by 13.3. Southern Miss: 3 by 66.7. Tulsa: 2 by 93.3. UCF: 2 by 76.7. Memphis: 6 by 100. Rice: 4 by 88.3. East Carolina: 4 by 63.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins42.9 · Games = 9 · +8.4 vs Losses
Losses34.5 · Games = 4 · -8.4 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | @ Air Force | L 20-47 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 12/5 | @ East Carolina | L 32-38 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Rice | W 73-14 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Memphis | W 55-14 | — | 6 | 98 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ UCF | L 32-37 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Tulsa | W 46-45 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Southern Miss | W 50-43 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs SMU | W 38-15 | — | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Tulane | W 44-16 | — | 6 | 84 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Mississippi State | W 31-24 | — | 2 | 52 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 37 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ UTEP | L 41-58 | — | 7 | 63 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Oklahoma State | W 45-35 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Northwestern State | W 55-7 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Houston | 33 | 80 | 5.9 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Houston | 418 | 64.6 | 11.5 | 385 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Houston | 418 | 64.6 | 11.5 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Houston | 524 | 76 | 8.4 | 106 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Houston | 524 | 76 | 8.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98
Primary metric
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Southern
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
SMU
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Tulane
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Houston
524 primary output · 76 efficiency · 8.4 usage
59
#2
2009 Regular Season · Houston
59
524 primary · 76 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Houston
54.9
418 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 11.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
975
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Chaz Rodriguez
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.