Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2006Bowling Green
—
Ruben Ruiz shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
3.3
Season Value
51.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ruben Ruiz, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Ruben Ruiz shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Ruben Ruiz is listed for Bowling Green. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 2 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
3.3
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 0. Buffalo: 2. Florida International: 0. Kent State: 0. Ohio State: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Temple: 0. Akron: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Toledo: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
— vs Toledo
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | @ Toledo | L 21-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 11/16 | vs Miami (OH) | L 7-9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Akron | L 28-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Temple | L 14-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 10/19 | @ Central Michigan | L 14-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Ohio State | L 7-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Kent State | L 3-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Florida International | W 33-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Buffalo | W 48-40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Wisconsin | L 14-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2005-2006
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 2 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Boise State
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Buffalo
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Toledo
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Miami (OH)
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · Bowling Green
2 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
54.2
#2
2006 Regular Season · Bowling Green
51.7
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2003 · Rating 0.8
Homestead · Cupertino, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.