Top 25
21-39
- Games
- 60
- Win rate
- 35.0%
Coach Profile
2004-2019 • Cincinnati, Michigan State
2 schools coached, anchored by Michigan State.
Mark Dantonio coached 16 seasons, won 64.1%, and posted an average SRS of 7.2. Best season: 2014 Michigan State. The profile was defense-first with a swing-heavy profile. 2 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Michigan State
Defense-First profile with 2 program stops and a peak score of 84.2.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
11-2 • SRS 20.0 • SP Overall 24.1
Win %
84.6%
YoY SRS
+4.1
SP Off / Def
42.5 / 17.9
Finish
#5
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
21-39
Top 10
10-20
Top 5
4-7
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Michigan State
2007-2019 • 13 seasons
Avg SRS 9.1 • Win % 66.7%
Cincinnati
2004-2006 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS -1.2 • Win % 51.4%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mark Dantonio sets the reference point in overall strength.
Mark Dantonio sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mark Dantonio
Elite
Elite
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
2007-2019 • 114-57
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.8 during vs 4.8 baseline
+4.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
9.1 during vs 3.3 baseline
+5.8
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
13.2 during vs 4.6 baseline
+8.6
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
53.8% during vs 0.0% baseline
+53.8%
2004-2006 • 18-17
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.0 during vs 5.8 baseline
+0.2
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-1.2 during vs -0.3 baseline
-0.9
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
1.7 during vs 2.7 baseline
-1.0
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Michigan State 2014
11-2 • SRS 20.0
Biggest Improvement
Cincinnati 2006
7-5 • 13.5 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Michigan State 2014
11-2 • SP Off 42.5
Best Defensive Season
Michigan State 2012
7-6 • SP Def 10.2
Setbacks
Worst Season
Cincinnati 2005
4-7 • SRS -9.4
Biggest Drop
Michigan State 2016
3-9 • -12.9 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Michigan State | 2019 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | #18 | — | 5.1 | 7.2 | 24.4 | 16.1 | -1.1 | 0.0% |
| Michigan State | 2018 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | #11 | — | 6.2 | 11.5 | 22.0 | 10.8 | -6.6 | -23.1% |
| Michigan State | 2017 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% | — | #15 | 12.8 | 13.8 | 27.7 | 15.1 | +11.7 | +51.9% |
| Michigan State | 2016 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 25.0% | #12 | — | 1.1 | 7.4 | 31.0 | 24.1 | -12.9 | -60.7% |
| Michigan State | 2015 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 85.7% | #5 | #6 | 14.0 | 15.6 | 35.7 | 20.6 | -6.0 | +1.1% |
| Michigan State | 2014 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #8 | #5 | 20.0 | 24.1 | 42.5 | 17.9 | +4.1 | -8.2% |
| Michigan State | 2013 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 92.9% | — | #3 | 15.9 | 19.7 | 28.9 | 11.6 | +9.7 | +39.0% |
| Michigan State | 2012 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | #13 | — | 6.2 | 12.4 | 21.3 | 10.2 | -6.8 | -24.7% |
| Michigan State | 2011 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% | #17 | #11 | 13.0 | 20.2 | 33.5 | 14.7 | +5.8 | -6.0% |
| Michigan State | 2010 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | — | #14 | 7.2 | 13.8 | 34.7 | 23.3 | +4.7 | +38.5% |
| Michigan State | 2009 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.2% | — | — | 2.5 | 8.7 | 32.1 | 24.5 | -3.9 | -23.1% |
| Michigan State | 2008 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #24 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 24.9 | 19.8 | -1.2 | +15.4% |
| Michigan State | 2007 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 7.6 | 10.0 | 32.1 | 22.5 | +3.5 | -4.5% |
| Cincinnati | 2006 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 4.1 | 7.9 | 23.6 | 16.7 | +13.5 | +22.0% |
| Cincinnati | 2005 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% | — | — | -9.4 | -9.9 | 18.4 | 28.2 | -11.2 | -22.0% |
| Cincinnati | 2004 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 1.8 | 7.1 | 36.5 | 31.7 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.9
Avg SRS 8.1 • Peak SRS 20.0 • 16 seasons
Best finish #11 • Volatility 6.2
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 6.9 • Peak SRS 15.9 • 12 seasons
Best finish #8 • Volatility 7.0
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 7.3 • Peak SRS 16.6 • 12 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 6.1
Open profile →same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.2
Avg SRS 4.7 • Peak SRS 16.9 • 11 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 6.9
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.3
Avg SRS 8.5 • Peak SRS 17.9 • 12 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.7
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS 8.2 • Peak SRS 21.8 • 11 seasons
Best finish #6 • Volatility 6.7
Open profile →