Back to Coaches
Longevity CoachDefense-First

Coach Profile

Luke Fickell

2011-2025Cincinnati, Ohio State, Wisconsin

3 schools coached, anchored by Cincinnati.

Luke Fickell coached 11 seasons, won 66.7%, and posted an average SRS of 4.7. Best season: 2021 Cincinnati. The profile was defense-first with a swing-heavy profile. 3 stints shaped the career arc.

Career record
76-38
Career win rate
66.7%
Average SRS
4.7
Peak SRS
16.9

Career Dossier

One glance at the full arc.

The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.

Seasons coached
11
Career span
15 years
Best finish
#4
Consistency
45.7

Primary school anchor

Cincinnati

Defense-First profile with 3 program stops and a peak score of 77.9.

Career Arc

Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Luke Fickell
EliteStrongAverageLean
Luke Fickell: 2017 CincinnatiLuke Fickell: 2022 Wisconsin
2011Actual season year • SRS range -12.6 to 16.92025

Active comparison point

Luke Fickell2021

Selected

2021 Cincinnati

Best season

13-1 • SRS 16.9 • SP Overall 21.2

Win %

92.9%

YoY SRS

SP Off / Def

37.5 / 15.9

Finish

#4

Comparison context

Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.

Ranked opponent record

Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.

Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.

Poll source
Ranking timing

Top 25

9-26

Games
35
Win rate
25.7%

Top 10

1-12

Games
13
Win rate
7.7%

Top 5

0-9

Games
9
Win rate
0.0%
View ranked game results35
2025 Regular Week 12WisconsinIndiana#2L7-31
2025 Regular Week 11WisconsinWashington#24W13-10
2025 Regular Week 9WisconsinOregon#6L7-21
2025 Regular Week 8WisconsinOhio State#1L0-34
2025 Regular Week 6WisconsinMichigan#20L10-24
2025 Regular Week 3WisconsinAlabama#19L14-38
2024 Regular Week 12WisconsinOregon#1L13-16
2024 Regular Week 9WisconsinPenn State#3L13-28
2024 Regular Week 5WisconsinUSC#13L21-38
2024 Regular Week 3WisconsinAlabama#4L10-42
2023 Regular Week 9WisconsinOhio State#3L10-24
2023 Postseason Week 1WisconsinLSU#12L31-35
2022 Regular Week 13CincinnatiTulane#19L24-27
2022 Regular Week 4WisconsinOhio State#3L21-52
2022 Regular Week 1CincinnatiArkansas#19L24-31
2021 Regular Week 14CincinnatiHouston#16W35-20
2021 Regular Week 5CincinnatiNotre Dame#9W24-13
2021 Postseason Week 1CincinnatiAlabama#2L6-27
2020 Regular Week 16CincinnatiTulsa#20W27-24
2020 Regular Week 8CincinnatiSMU#16W42-13
2020 Regular Week 4CincinnatiArmy#22W24-10
2020 Postseason Week 1CincinnatiGeorgia#7L21-24
2019 Regular Week 15CincinnatiMemphis#16L24-29
2019 Regular Week 14CincinnatiMemphis#17L24-34
2019 Regular Week 6CincinnatiUCF#18W27-24
2019 Regular Week 2CincinnatiOhio State#5L0-42
2018 Regular Week 12CincinnatiUCF#11L13-38
2017 Regular Week 7CincinnatiSouth Florida#18L3-33
2017 Regular Week 6CincinnatiUCF#25L23-51
2017 Regular Week 2CincinnatiMichigan#8L14-36
2011 Regular Week 13Ohio StateMichigan#17L34-40
2011 Regular Week 12Ohio StatePenn State#21L14-20
2011 Regular Week 9Ohio StateWisconsin#12W33-29
2011 Regular Week 7Ohio StateIllinois#16W17-7
2011 Regular Week 6Ohio StateNebraska#14L27-34

Tenure map

Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.

Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger stint

Wisconsin

2022-20254 seasons

Avg SRS 3.9 • Win % 50.0%

Cincinnati

2017-20226 seasons

Avg SRS 5.2 • Win % 76.0%

Ohio State

2011-20111 seasons

Avg SRS 4.9 • Win % 46.2%

Longest tenure
Cincinnati • 6 seasons
Best tenure
Cincinnati • 5.2 SRS
Best tenure win rate
Cincinnati • 76.0%

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Luke Fickell sets the reference point in overall strength.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Luke Fickell sets the reference point in overall strength.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Luke Fickell

Strong

Raw avg SP Overall
7.2
Percentile
78th pct

Strong

Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.

Impact by school

See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.

Wisconsin

2022-202513-13

Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).

Avg SRS 3.9Win % 50.0%

Avg wins

Higher is better

3.3 during vs 8.8 baseline

-5.5

Avg SRS

Higher is better

3.9 during vs 15.4 baseline

-11.5

Avg SP Overall

Higher is better

4.1 during vs 21.8 baseline

-17.8

Ranked finish rate

Higher is better

0.0% during vs 40.0% baseline

-40.0%

Cincinnati

2017-202257-18

Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).

Avg SRS 5.2Win % 76.0%

Avg wins

Higher is better

9.5 during vs 7.6 baseline

+1.9

Avg SRS

Higher is better

5.2 during vs 0.2 baseline

+5.0

Avg SP Overall

Higher is better

8.5 during vs 5.5 baseline

+3.0

Ranked finish rate

Higher is better

50.0% during vs 0.0% baseline

+50.0%

Ohio State

2011-20116-7

Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).

Avg SRS 4.9Win % 46.2%

Avg wins

Higher is better

6.0 during vs 11.2 baseline

-5.2

Avg SRS

Higher is better

4.9 during vs 18.7 baseline

-13.8

Avg SP Overall

Higher is better

13.2 during vs 26.0 baseline

-12.8

Ranked finish rate

Higher is better

0.0% during vs 100.0% baseline

-100.0%

Career highs and lows

High Points

Best Season

Cincinnati 2021

13-1SRS 16.9

Biggest Improvement

Cincinnati 2018

11-219.9 SRS

Best Offensive Season

Cincinnati 2021

13-1SP Off 37.5

Best Defensive Season

Wisconsin 2023

7-6SP Def 14.1

Setbacks

Worst Season

Cincinnati 2017

4-8SRS -12.6

Biggest Drop

Cincinnati 2017

4-8-17.5 SRS

Season-by-season results

Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.

Wisconsin202500002.3-4.417.420.9-1.7
Wisconsin20241257041.7%4.03.023.019.80.0-12.2%
Wisconsin20231376053.8%#194.09.422.214.1-1.4-46.2%
Cincinnati20221293075.0%#235.713.127.616.1-11.2-17.9%
Wisconsin20221100100.0%#185.48.325.717.1-0.3+25.0%
Cincinnati202114131092.9%#8#416.921.237.515.9+2.9%
Cincinnati20201091090.0%#20#8+11.4%
Cincinnati201914113078.6%#218.99.129.121.1+1.6-6.0%
Cincinnati201813112084.6%7.35.428.322.6+19.9+51.3%
Cincinnati20171248033.3%-12.6-6.423.328.2-17.5-12.8%
Ohio State20111367046.2%#184.913.228.517.0

Similar coaches

Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.

Randy Shannon

same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.7

Defense-First

Avg SRS 5.4 • Peak SRS 15.35 seasons

Best finish #19 • Volatility 6.8

Open profile →

Don Fambrough

same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.9

Defense-First

Avg SRS 3.8 • Peak SRS 17.28 seasons

Best finish #18 • Volatility 7.5

Open profile →

Matt Rhule

same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.9

Defense-First

Avg SRS 2.8 • Peak SRS 14.710 seasons

Best finish #13 • Volatility 6.7

Open profile →

Mark Dantonio

same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.2

Defense-First

Avg SRS 7.2 • Peak SRS 20.016 seasons

Best finish #3 • Volatility 6.8

Open profile →

Earle Edwards

same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.1

Defense-First

Avg SRS 2.5 • Peak SRS 15.917 seasons

Best finish #15 • Volatility 7.0

Open profile →

Alex Agase

same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.1

Defense-First

Avg SRS 2.3 • Peak SRS 17.713 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.0

Open profile →