High School Profile
Avon, CT. Follow the volume, blue-chip spikes, destination programs, and draft conversion that define this recruiting pipeline.
Recruiting answers
Quick answers for school, city, state, recruit, destination, and draft searches.
Overview
The quick facts that frame this school's recruiting footprint.
First recruit year
2002
Latest recruit year
2026
Top college destination
Boston College
Most common position group
DL
Best class by recruits
2024 (3)
Best class by blue-chip
2026 (2)
Timeline
Year-by-year recruiting output, blue-chip spikes, and drafted-player classes.
Stars
The mix of 3-star, 4-star, 5-star, and unrated recruits in this school's history.
Best Classes
The years that delivered the biggest jumps in volume, premium talent, and draft outcomes.
Most FBS recruits
2024 (3)
Most blue-chip recruits
2026 (2)
Most drafted players
2008 (2)
Destinations
Which colleges sign the most recruits from this school?
Positions
The position groups this school produces most often.
Draft Outcomes
Which recruits from this high school eventually got drafted, and where did they land?
Context
A compact readout of the signals that matter most when comparing this school to other pipelines.
Blue-chip concentration
7 premium prospects
38.9% of known FBS recruits were four-stars or five-stars.
Draft conversion
11.1%
Draft status stays visible even when round and pick data are incomplete.
Top destination lane
Boston College
2 recruits reached the leading destination program.
Draft Table
Draft year, round, and pick stay optional so drafted status remains visible even when the player bridge is incomplete.
| Player | Class | Stars | Position | College | Draft Year | Round | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khaseem Greene | 2008 | 2★ | ATH | Rutgers | 2013 | 4 | 20 |
| Michael Cox | 2008 | 3★ | RB | — | 2013 | 7 | 47 |
Top Recruits
Sorted by stars, rating, class year, and name to keep the table deterministic.
| Player | Class | Stars | Rating | Position | College | Drafted | Draft Round |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Clark | 2015 | 4★ | 0.96 | TE | UCLA | No | — |
| Ryan Puglisi | 2024 | 4★ | 0.95 | QB | Georgia | No | — |
| Benedict Umeh | 2024 | 4★ | 0.93 | DL | Stanford | No | — |
| Andre Jones | 2005 | 4★ | 0.90 | CB | — | No | — |
| Charlie Thom | 2026 | 4★ | 0.90 | OT | Notre Dame | No | — |
| Owen Aliciene | 2025 | 4★ | 0.90 | OT | Penn State | No | — |
| Mason Leak | 2026 | 4★ | 0.89 | EDGE | Boston College | No | — |
| Michael Cox | 2008 | 3★ | 0.89 | RB | — | Yes | 7 |
| Micheal Ahoua | 2026 | 3★ | 0.88 | ATH | — | No | — |
| Jaedon Roberts | 2020 | 3★ | 0.87 | ATH | — | No | — |
| Rayshon Andrews | 2025 | 3★ | 0.86 | CB | — | No | — |
| Dante Recker | 2025 | 3★ | 0.86 | DL | — | No | — |
| Jack Hines | 2024 | 3★ | 0.86 | OT | — | No | — |
| Keke Adams | 2024 | 3★ | 0.86 | S | — | No | — |
| James Wilborn Jr. | 2021 | 3★ | 0.86 | LB | — | No | — |
| Christian Alliegro | 2023 | 3★ | 0.86 | LB | Wisconsin | No | — |
| Derrick Brown Jr. | 2024 | 3★ | 0.85 | LB | Duke | No | — |
| Brian Hnat | 2025 | 3★ | 0.85 | TE | James Madison | No | — |
| Deon Anderson | 2002 | 3★ | 0.83 | ILB | — | No | — |
| Josh Tracey | 2021 | 3★ | 0.81 | WR | UConn | No | — |
| Anthony Giudice | 2015 | 3★ | 0.81 | DT | Syracuse | No | — |
| Sean McQuillan | 2011 | 3★ | 0.81 | WDE | UConn | No | — |
| Xavier Copening | 2021 | 3★ | 0.81 | QB | — | No | — |
| Harrison Leonard | 2019 | 3★ | 0.80 | K | Notre Dame | No | — |
| John Van Allen | 2013 | 2★ | 0.79 | OLB | Harvard | No | — |
| Justin Jarvis | 2006 | 2★ | 0.77 | WR | Boston College | No | — |
| Khaseem Greene | 2008 | 2★ | 0.76 | ATH | Rutgers | Yes | 4 |
| Kieran Delaney | 2004 | 2★ | 0.74 | OG | Georgia Tech | No | — |
| Evan Deckers | 2018 | 2★ | 0.74 | LS | Massachusetts | No | — |
Similar Schools
Peers are ranked by same-state preference plus nearby recruit volume, draft rate, and position profile.
Explore More
Jump from this school into state views, national slices, destination programs, and player pages.
Compare this school against every other pipeline in CT.
See how this program compares once the leaderboard enforces a recruit threshold.
Jump into the national 5-star leaderboard.
Follow the strongest destination pipeline out of this school.
Follow the strongest destination pipeline out of this school.