Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2015-2018Memphis
Chris Clark
TE • 6'6" • 260 lbs • Ridgewood, NJ, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Chris Clark reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
53
Consistency
64.1
Season Value
56.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UCLA • Pittsburgh • Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Clark, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Chris Clark reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Chris Clark played TE for UCLA, Pittsburgh, and Memphis. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chris Clark recorded 122 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Pittsburgh.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 122 primary output with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across UCLA, Pittsburgh, Memphis.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
15.3
Efficiency
53
Usage
10.6
Consistency
64.1
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 7. Georgia Tech: 9. Rice: 23. NC State: 20. Virginia: 1. North Carolina: 26. Virginia Tech: 11. Miami: 25
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 1 by 46.7. Georgia Tech: 2 by 30. Rice: 5 by 30.7. NC State: 2 by 66.7. Virginia: 1 by 6.7. North Carolina: 2 by 86.7. Virginia Tech: 1 by 73.3. Miami: 2 by 83.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16.3 · Games = 3 · +1.7 vs Losses
Losses14.6 · Games = 5 · -1.7 vs Wins
First Half14.8 · Games = 4 · -1 vs Second Half
Second Half15.8 · Games = 4 · +1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Carolina
Best efficiency game
86.7 vs North Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Miami | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Virginia Tech | L 14-20 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/10 | vs North Carolina | L 31-34 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Virginia | W 31-14 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs NC State | L 17-35 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Rice | W 42-10 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Georgia Tech | L 17-35 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Oklahoma State | L 21-59 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCLA
2015
Opening stop
- 2
Pittsburgh
2016-2017
Peak year stop
- 3
Memphis
2018
Final stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 122 | 53 | 10.6 | 122 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | -122 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26
Primary metric
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#2
Miami
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#3
NC State
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 30.7 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia Tech
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
122 primary output · 53 efficiency · 10.6 usage
56.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · UCLA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7903
North Panola · Sardis, MS
- Committed To
- Memphis
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
3
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
122
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.