Usage Score
20.1
Player Dossier
2014-2015Tennessee
Von Pearson
WR • 6'0" • Newport News, VA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Von Pearson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.7
Consistency
52.6
Season Value
60.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Tennessee
14141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Von Pearson, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Tennessee. Von Pearson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Von Pearson played WR for Tennessee. Across 2 tracked seasons, Von Pearson recorded 22 rushing yards, 802 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Tennessee.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Tennessee paired 409 primary output with 70.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Tennessee
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
34.1
Efficiency
70.7
Usage
20.1
Consistency
52.6
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 32. Bowling Green: 48. Oklahoma: 0. Western Carolina: 9. Arkansas: 30. Georgia: 25. Alabama: 15. Kentucky: 37. South Carolina: 121. North Texas: 24. Missouri: 28. Vanderbilt: 40
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 2 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Western Carolina: 1 by 60. Arkansas: 3 by 66.7. Georgia: 2 by 83.3. Alabama: 2 by 50. Kentucky: 5 by 49.3. South Carolina: 8 by 100. North Texas: 3 by 53.3. Missouri: 7 by 26.7. Vanderbilt: 3 by 88.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins40.4 · Games = 9 · +25.4 vs Losses
Losses15 · Games = 3 · -25.4 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Northwestern | W 45-6 | — | 2 | 32 | 10.7 | 16 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Vanderbilt2+ TD | W 53-28 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 2 | 18 |
| Sun 11/22 | @ Missouri | W 19-8 | — | 7 | 28 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs North Texas | W 24-0 | — | 3 | 24 | 5.3 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs South Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-24 | — | 8 | 121 | 15.1 | 15.10 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Kentucky | W 52-21 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Alabama | L 14-19 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Georgia | W 38-31 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Arkansas | L 20-24 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Western Carolina | W 55-10 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Oklahoma | L 24-31 | — | — | — | -3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Bowling Green | W 59-30 | — | 2 | 48 | 16.3 | 24 | 0 | 45 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2014-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Tennessee | 393 | 64.5 | 17.8 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tennessee | 393 | 64.5 | 17.8 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Tennessee | 409 | 70.7 | 20.1 | 16 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tennessee | 409 | 70.7 | 20.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121
Primary metric
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas State
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 71.4 efficiency score.
#4
South Carolina
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#5
Kentucky
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Tennessee
409 primary output · 70.7 efficiency · 20.1 usage
60.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · Tennessee
60.9
409 primary · 70.7 efficiency · 20.1 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Tennessee
57.8
393 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 17.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
802
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Von Pearson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.