Usage Score
9.6
Player Dossier
2013-2017Ohio
LB • 6'0" • 222 lbs • Grove City, OH, USA
Chad Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
9.6
Efficiency
41.7
Consistency
40.8
Season Value
48
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chad Moore, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Ohio. Chad Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.7 disruption score.
Chad Moore played LB for Ohio. Across 5 tracked seasons, Chad Moore recorded 164 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Ohio.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Ohio paired 17.5 primary output with 41.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 41.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
41.7
Usage
9.6
Consistency
40.8
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 4. Hampton: 0. Purdue: 1. Eastern Michigan: 2. Massachusetts: 2. Central Michigan: 3. Bowling Green: 0.5. Kent State: 1. Miami (OH): 3. Toledo: 1. Akron: 0. Buffalo: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 4 by 56.7. Hampton: 2 by 8.3. Purdue: 7 by 39.2. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 53.3. Massachusetts: 12 by 70. Central Michigan: 9 by 67.5. Bowling Green: 3 by 17.5. Kent State: 5 by 30.8. Miami (OH): 9 by 67.5. Toledo: 6 by 35. Akron: 8 by 33.3. Buffalo: 5 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
70 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/22 | vs UABSplash game | W 41-6 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Buffalo | L 24-31 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/15 | @ Akron | L 34-37 | 8 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | vs Toledo | W 38-10 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/1 | vs Miami (OH)Splash game | W 45-28 | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Kent State | W 48-3 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Bowling Green | W 48-30 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Central MichiganSplash game | L 23-26 | 9 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Massachusetts10+ tackles · Splash game | W 58-50 | 12 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Eastern MichiganSplash game | W 27-20 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Purdue | L 21-44 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Hampton | W 59-0 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio | 17 | 40.6 | 8.6 | 17 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio | 17 | 40.6 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio | 17.5 | 41.7 | 9.6 | 0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio | 17.5 | 41.7 | 9.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.4 takeover score.
#2
UAB
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.4 takeover score.
#3
Kansas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#4
Central Michigan
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
#5
Miami (OH)
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Ohio
17.5 primary output · 41.7 efficiency · 9.6 usage
48
#2
2017 Regular Season · Ohio
48
17.5 primary · 41.7 efficiency · 9.6 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Ohio
46.8
17 primary · 40.6 efficiency · 8.6 usage
1
Impact games
11
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
164
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.