Usage Score
17.9
Player Dossier
2010-2016BYU
Mitchell Juergens
WR • 5'10" • Houston, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Mitchell Juergens reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67
Consistency
46.1
Season Value
50.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · BYU
101112131414151516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mitchell Juergens, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · BYU. Mitchell Juergens reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Mitchell Juergens played WR for BYU. Across 7 tracked seasons, Mitchell Juergens recorded 9 passing yards, 34 rushing yards, and 1,228 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with BYU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
BYU paired 424 primary output with 79.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Utah
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · BYU
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
33.3
Efficiency
67
Usage
17.9
Consistency
46.1
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 52. UCLA: 10. West Virginia: 50. Michigan State: 24. Mississippi State: 0. Boise State: 57. Cincinnati: 24. Southern Utah: 82. Massachusetts: 24. Utah State: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 8 by 43.3. UCLA: 1 by 66.7. West Virginia: 5 by 66.7. Michigan State: 2 by 80. Boise State: 4 by 95. Cincinnati: 4 by 40. Southern Utah: 6 by 91.1. Massachusetts: 3 by 53.3. Utah State: 1 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins27.3 · Games = 6 · -14.9 vs Losses
Losses42.3 · Games = 4 · +14.9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Southern Utah
Best efficiency game
95 vs Boise State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | vs Utah State | W 28-10 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Massachusetts | W 51-9 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Southern Utah | W 37-7 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Cincinnati | W 20-3 | — | 4 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 10/21 | @ Boise State | L 27-28 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Mississippi State | W 28-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Michigan State | W 31-14 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ West Virginia | L 32-35 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs UCLA | L 14-17 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ UtahHigh volume | L 19-20 | — | 8 | 52 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2010-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201020112012201320142014201520152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | BYU | 424 | 79.6 | 11.2 | 424 |
| 2014 Regular Season | BYU | 424 | 79.6 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | BYU | 471 | 58.5 | 12.7 | 47 |
| 2015 Regular Season | BYU | 471 | 58.5 | 12.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | BYU | 333 | 67 | 17.9 | -138 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boise State
172
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
172 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Southern Utah
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Boise State
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Postseason · BYU
424 primary output · 79.6 efficiency · 11.2 usage
54.6
#2
2014 Regular Season · BYU
54.6
424 primary · 79.6 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · BYU
51.2
471 primary · 58.5 efficiency · 12.7 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,228
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Mitchell Juergens
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.