Usage Score
16.4
Player Dossier
2013-2016UAB
Jamari Staples
WR • 6'4" • Lineville, AL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jamari Staples reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.7
Consistency
43.3
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Louisville
131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UAB • Louisville
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamari Staples, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Louisville. Jamari Staples reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Louisville paired 638 primary output with 88 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, Louisville.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Louisville
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
55.9
Efficiency
84.7
Usage
16.4
Consistency
43.3
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 22. Charlotte: 83. Syracuse: 136. Marshall: 94. Clemson: 35. Duke: 62. NC State: 16. Virginia: 120. Boston College: 11. Wake Forest: 28. Houston: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 1 by 100. Charlotte: 4 by 100. Syracuse: 5 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 100. Clemson: 4 by 58.3. Duke: 3 by 100. NC State: 1 by 100. Virginia: 7 by 100. Boston College: 1 by 73.3. Wake Forest: 4 by 46.7. Houston: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins68.8 · n=8 · +47.1 vs Losses
Losses21.7 · n=3 · -47.1 vs Wins
First Half72 · n=6 · +35.4 vs Second Half
Second Half36.6 · n=5 · -35.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
100 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | vs LSU | L 9-29 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 11/18 | @ Houston | L 10-36 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Wake Forest | W 44-12 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Boston College | W 52-7 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Virginia100 receiving yards | W 32-25 | — | 7 | 120 | 17.1 | 17.10 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs NC State | W 54-13 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 16 |
| Fri 10/14 | vs Duke | W 24-14 | — | 3 | 62 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Clemson | L 36-42 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Marshall | W 59-28 | — | 5 | 94 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Syracuse100 receiving yards | W 62-28 | — | 5 | 136 | 27.2 | 27.20 | 0 | 55 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Charlotte | W 70-14 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 0 | 44 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2013-2014
Opening stop
- 2
Louisville
2015-2016
Final stop
Season Progression
201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UAB | 458 | 90.2 | 19.5 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UAB | 190 | 91.3 | 10.4 | -268 |
| 2015 Postseason | Louisville | 638 | 88 | 18.2 | 448 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Louisville | 638 | 88 | 18.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Louisville | 615 | 84.7 | 16.4 | -23 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisville | 615 | 84.7 | 16.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
194
Primary metric
194 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Troy
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Louisville
638 primary output · 88 efficiency · 18.2 usage
63.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Louisville
63.3
638 primary · 88 efficiency · 18.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UAB
61.4
458 primary · 90.2 efficiency · 19.5 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7926
Clay Co · Ashland, AL
- Committed To
- UAB
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,901
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.