Usage Score
16.4
Player Dossier
2013-2016Louisville
WR • 6'4" • Lineville, AL, USA
Jamari Staples reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.4
Efficiency
84.7
Consistency
43.3
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Louisville
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamari Staples, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Louisville. Jamari Staples reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jamari Staples played WR for UAB and Louisville. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jamari Staples recorded 3 rushing yards, 1,901 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Louisville.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Louisville paired 638 primary output with 88 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, Louisville.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
55.9
Efficiency
84.7
Usage
16.4
Consistency
43.3
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 22. Charlotte: 83. Syracuse: 136. Marshall: 94. Clemson: 35. Duke: 62. NC State: 16. Virginia: 120. Boston College: 11. Wake Forest: 28. Houston: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 1 by 100. Charlotte: 4 by 100. Syracuse: 5 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 100. Clemson: 4 by 58.3. Duke: 3 by 100. NC State: 1 by 100. Virginia: 7 by 100. Boston College: 1 by 73.3. Wake Forest: 4 by 46.7. Houston: 1 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
100 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | vs LSU | L 9-29 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 11/18 | @ Houston | L 10-36 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Wake Forest | W 44-12 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Boston College | W 52-7 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Virginia100 receiving yards | W 32-25 | — | 7 | 120 | 17.1 | 17.10 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs NC State | W 54-13 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 16 |
| Fri 10/14 | vs Duke | W 24-14 | — | 3 | 62 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Clemson | L 36-42 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Marshall | W 59-28 | — | 5 | 94 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Syracuse100 receiving yards | W 62-28 | — | 5 | 136 | 27.2 | 27.20 | 0 | 55 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Charlotte | W 70-14 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 0 | 44 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2013-2014
Opening stop
Louisville
2015-2016
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UAB | 458 | 90.2 | 19.5 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UAB | 190 | 91.3 | 10.4 | -268 |
| 2015 Postseason | Louisville | 638 | 88 | 18.2 | 448 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Louisville | 638 | 88 | 18.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Louisville | 615 | 84.7 | 16.4 | -23 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisville | 615 | 84.7 | 16.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
194
Primary metric
194 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Troy
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Louisville
638 primary output · 88 efficiency · 18.2 usage
63.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Louisville
63.3
638 primary · 88 efficiency · 18.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UAB
61.4
458 primary · 90.2 efficiency · 19.5 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7926
Clay Co · Ashland, AL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,901
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.