Usage Score
38.9
Player Dossier
2013-2016Navy
QB • 6'1" • Valrico, FL, USA
Will Worth is a dual-threat creator with 38.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
38.9
Efficiency
73.2
Consistency
77.6
Season Value
72.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Navy
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Will Worth, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Navy. Will Worth is a dual-threat creator with 38.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Will Worth played QB for Navy. Across 4 tracked seasons, Will Worth recorded 1,397 passing yards, 1,208 rushing yards, and 34 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Navy.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Navy paired 2,595 primary output with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
216.3
Efficiency
73.2
Usage
38.9
Consistency
77.6
Best Game by takeover score
South Florida
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fordham: 100. UConn: 174. Tulane: 172. Air Force: 254. Houston: 191. Memphis: 286. South Florida: 428. Notre Dame: 223. Tulsa: 233. East Carolina: 272. SMU: 211. Temple: 51
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fordham: 12 by 81.1. UConn: 27 by 74.5. Tulane: 37 by 57. Air Force: 47 by 50.6. Houston: 37 by 74. Memphis: 35 by 85. South Florida: 53 by 72.4. Notre Dame: 36 by 68.8. Tulsa: 34 by 80.5. East Carolina: 33 by 79.2. SMU: 22 by 85.7. Temple: 8 by 69.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
85.7 vs SMU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | vs Temple | L 10-34 | 1 | 2 | 34 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 69.6 | 6 | 17 | 2.80 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ SMU3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 75-31 | 5 | 7 | 104 | 71.4 | 1 | 0 | 85.7 | 15 | 107 | 7.10 | 3 | 29 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ East Carolina3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 66-31 | 3 | 5 | 113 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 79.2 | 28 | 159 | 5.70 | 4 | 30 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Tulsa3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 42-40 | 6 | 8 | 111 | 75.0 | 1 | 0 | 80.5 | 26 | 122 | 4.70 | 3 | 44 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Notre DameDual-threat | W 28-27 | 5 | 8 | 48 | 62.5 | 0 | 0 | 68.8 | 28 | 175 | 6.30 | 2 | 60 |
| Fri 10/28 | @ South Florida3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 45-52 | 15 | 25 | 299 | 60.0 | 1 | 1 | 72.4 | 28 | 129 | 4.60 | 4 | 17 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Memphis3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 42-28 | 3 | 4 | 85 | 75.0 | 2 | 0 | 85 | 31 | 201 | 6.50 | 3 | 28 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Houston3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 46-40 | 3 | 5 | 76 | 60.0 | 2 | 0 | 74 | 32 | 115 | 3.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Air Force | L 14-28 | 17 | 30 | 260 | 56.7 | 0 | 2 | 50.6 | 17 | -6 | -0.40 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ TulaneDual-threat | W 21-14 | 5 | 12 | 59 | 41.7 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 25 | 113 | 4.50 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UConn | W 28-24 | 6 | 8 | 130 | 75.0 | 0 | 0 | 74.5 | 19 | 44 | 2.30 | 2 | 9 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Fordham | W 52-16 | 3 | 3 | 78 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 81.1 | 9 | 22 | 2.40 | 1 | 8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Navy
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Navy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Navy | 10 | 8.3 | 6.3 | 10 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Navy | 0 | — | — | -10 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Navy | 2,595 | 73.2 | 38.9 | 2,595 |
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
428
Primary metric
428 total offense with 72.4 efficiency.
#2
Memphis
286
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
286 total offense with 85 efficiency.
#3
East Carolina
272
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
272 total offense with 79.2 efficiency.
#4
Tulsa
233
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
233 total offense with 80.5 efficiency.
#5
Notre Dame
223
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
223 total offense with 68.8 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Navy
2,595 primary output · 73.2 efficiency · 38.9 usage
72.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · Navy
28.7
10 primary · 8.3 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Navy
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
2
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
6
3+ TD games
10
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,605
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.