Usage Score
25.8
Player Dossier
2013-2016Notre Dame
Torii Hunter Jr.
WR • 6'0" • Prosper, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Torii Hunter Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.9
Consistency
78.2
Season Value
71.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
1314151516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Torii Hunter Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Torii Hunter Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 521 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
65.1
Efficiency
83.9
Usage
25.8
Consistency
78.2
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 37. Michigan State: 95. Duke: 75. Syracuse: 64. NC State: 19. Stanford: 70. Miami: 57. Navy: 104
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 4 by 61.7. Michigan State: 5 by 100. Duke: 6 by 83.3. Syracuse: 4 by 100. NC State: 2 by 63.3. Stanford: 4 by 100. Miami: 5 by 76. Navy: 8 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Wins60.5 · n=2 · -6.2 vs Losses
Losses66.7 · n=6 · +6.2 vs Wins
First Half67.8 · n=4 · +5.3 vs Second Half
Second Half62.5 · n=4 · -5.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/5 | @ Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-28 | — | 8 | 104 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Miami | W 30-27 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Stanford | L 10-17 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ NC State | L 3-10 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Syracuse | W 50-33 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Duke | L 35-38 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Michigan State | L 28-36 | — | 5 | 95 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 47 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Texas | L 47-50 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 65 | 61.4 | 6.8 | 65 |
| 2015 Postseason | Notre Dame | 363 | 82.3 | 12.4 | 298 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 363 | 82.3 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 521 | 83.9 | 25.8 | 158 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Primary metric
104 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan State
95
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Stanford
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
521 primary output · 83.9 efficiency · 25.8 usage
71.8
#2
2015 Postseason · Notre Dame
56.6
363 primary · 82.3 efficiency · 12.4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Notre Dame
56.6
363 primary · 82.3 efficiency · 12.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9171
Prosper · Prosper, TX
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
949
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.