Usage Score
25.8
Player Dossier
2013-2016Notre Dame
WR • 6'0" • Prosper, TX, USA
Torii Hunter Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.8
Efficiency
83.9
Consistency
78.2
Season Value
71.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Torii Hunter Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Torii Hunter Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Torii Hunter Jr. played WR for Notre Dame. Across 4 tracked seasons, Torii Hunter Jr. recorded 35 passing yards, 29 rushing yards, and 949 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Notre Dame.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 521 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
65.1
Efficiency
83.9
Usage
25.8
Consistency
78.2
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 37. Michigan State: 95. Duke: 75. Syracuse: 64. NC State: 19. Stanford: 70. Miami: 57. Navy: 104
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 4 by 61.7. Michigan State: 5 by 100. Duke: 6 by 83.3. Syracuse: 4 by 100. NC State: 2 by 63.3. Stanford: 4 by 100. Miami: 5 by 76. Navy: 8 by 86.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/5 | @ Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-28 | — | 8 | 104 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Miami | W 30-27 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Stanford | L 10-17 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ NC State | L 3-10 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Syracuse | W 50-33 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Duke | L 35-38 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Michigan State | L 28-36 | — | 5 | 95 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 47 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Texas | L 47-50 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 19 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 65 | 61.4 | 6.8 | 65 |
| 2015 Postseason | Notre Dame | 363 | 82.3 | 12.4 | 298 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 363 | 82.3 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 521 | 83.9 | 25.8 | 158 |
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Primary metric
104 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan State
95
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Stanford
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Notre Dame
521 primary output · 83.9 efficiency · 25.8 usage
71.8
#2
2015 Postseason · Notre Dame
56.6
363 primary · 82.3 efficiency · 12.4 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Notre Dame
56.6
363 primary · 82.3 efficiency · 12.4 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9171
Prosper · Prosper, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
949
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.