Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2013-2015Notre Dame
—
Will Fuller V shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
78.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Will Fuller V, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Will Fuller V shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Will Fuller V is listed for Notre Dame. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 15 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
1.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 1. Texas: 2. Virginia: 2. Georgia Tech: 1. Massachusetts: 1. Clemson: 0. Navy: 1. USC: 1. Temple: 1. Pittsburgh: 3. Wake Forest: 0. Boston College: 0. Stanford: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
— vs Ohio State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Ohio State | L 28-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Stanford | L 36-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Boston College | W 19-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Wake Forest | W 28-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Pittsburgh | W 42-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Temple | W 24-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | vs USC | W 41-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Navy | W 41-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/4 | @ Clemson | L 22-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Massachusetts | W 62-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Georgia Tech | W 30-22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Virginia | W 34-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Texas | W 38-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 15 | — | — | 14 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 14 | — | — | -1 |
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Northwestern
3
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#3
Pittsburgh
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
North Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Syracuse
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame
15 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
84.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Notre Dame
78.8
14 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Notre Dame
6.1
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
7
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9029
Roman Catholic · Philadelphia, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.