Player Stats

Austin Ramesh College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
277
Rushing yards
147
Receiving yards
130
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonWisconsin00000-
2014 Regular SeasonWisconsin318018135.3
2015 Regular SeasonWisconsin112012053.1
2016 PostseasonWisconsin1110100036.7
2016 Regular SeasonWisconsin11724824336.7
2017 PostseasonWisconsin1034727044.9
2017 Regular SeasonWisconsin101318249244.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Wisconsin paired 12 primary output with 100 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 40 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota

Win with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Wisconsin

Games

10

Scrimmage Yards / G

16.5

Efficiency

40

Usage

4

Consistency

28.2

Best Game by takeover score

Minnesota

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 34. Utah State: 11. BYU: 3. Northwestern: 7. Purdue: 2. Maryland: 11. Iowa: 0. Michigan: 0. Minnesota: 47. Ohio State: 50

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 5 by 50.2. Utah State: 2 by 57.3. BYU: 2 by 15.6. Northwestern: 2 by 36.5. Purdue: 1 by 20.8. Maryland: 3 by 38.2. Iowa: 1 by 0. Michigan: 1 by 0. Minnesota: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 81.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins12.8 · Games = 9 · -37.2 vs Losses
Losses50 · Games = 1 · +37.2 vs Wins