Usage Score
4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Wisconsin
Austin Ramesh
RB • 6'1" • 255 lbs • Land O’ Lakes, WI, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Austin Ramesh leans balanced backfield option traits and 40 efficiency.
Efficiency
40
Consistency
28.2
Season Value
43
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin
13141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Ramesh, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin. Austin Ramesh leans balanced backfield option traits and 40 efficiency.
Austin Ramesh played RB for Wisconsin. Across 5 tracked seasons, Austin Ramesh recorded 147 rushing yards, 130 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Wisconsin.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 12 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Win with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
16.5
Efficiency
40
Usage
4
Consistency
28.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 34. Utah State: 11. BYU: 3. Northwestern: 7. Purdue: 2. Maryland: 11. Iowa: 0. Michigan: 0. Minnesota: 47. Ohio State: 50
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 5 by 50.2. Utah State: 2 by 57.3. BYU: 2 by 15.6. Northwestern: 2 by 36.5. Purdue: 1 by 20.8. Maryland: 3 by 38.2. Iowa: 1 by 0. Michigan: 1 by 0. Minnesota: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 81.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins12.8 · Games = 9
First Half11.4 · Games = 5 · -10.2 vs Second Half
Second Half21.6 · Games = 5 · +10.2 vs First Half
All Games16.5 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
100 vs Minnesota
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/31 | @ Miami | W 34-24 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 3 | 27 | 6.8 |
| Sun 12/3 | vs Ohio State | L 21-27 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 45 | 16.7 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Minnesota | W 31-0 | 2 | 43 | 21.50 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 15.7 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Michigan | W 24-10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Iowa | W 38-14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Maryland | W 38-13 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 1 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Purdue | W 17-9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Northwestern | W 33-24 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | — | — | 3.5 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ BYU | W 40-6 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | — | — | 1.5 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Utah State | W 59-10 | 2 | 11 | 5.50 | 1 | — | — | 5.5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 18 | 50 | 1.7 | 18 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 12 | 100 | 1.8 | -6 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 82 | 34.3 | 3.1 | 70 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 82 | 34.3 | 3.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wisconsin | 165 | 40 | 4 | 83 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 165 | 40 | 4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Loss with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12
Primary metric
12 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#2
Minnesota
47
Primary metric
Win with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
47 scrimmage yards and 5.4 usage.
#3
Ohio State
50
Primary metric
Loss with 50 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
50 scrimmage yards and 5.8 usage.
#4
Northwestern
9
Primary metric
Loss with 9 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
9 scrimmage yards and 2 usage.
#5
LSU
21
Primary metric
Win with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
21 scrimmage yards and 4.9 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin
12 primary output · 100 efficiency · 1.8 usage
52.7
#2
2017 Postseason · Wisconsin
43
165 primary · 40 efficiency · 4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Wisconsin
43
165 primary · 40 efficiency · 4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8204
ProKick Australia · Australia, AUST
- Committed To
- Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
277
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.