Usage Score
19.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Army
Jeremy Timpf
LB • 6'1" • Tucson, AZ, USA
High-volume tacklerDown-to-down presence
Jeremy Timpf shows a high-volume tackler profile with 48 disruption score.
Efficiency
48
Consistency
62.5
Season Value
57.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Army
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Timpf, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Army. Jeremy Timpf shows a high-volume tackler profile with 48 disruption score.
Jeremy Timpf played LB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jeremy Timpf recorded 97 tackles and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Army.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Army paired 18.5 primary output with 48 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 48 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Army
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
48
Usage
19.1
Consistency
62.5
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 3. Temple: 0. Rice: 1. UTEP: 1.5. Buffalo: 1.5. Lafayette: 0. North Texas: 3. Wake Forest: 3. Air Force: 1. Notre Dame: 0.5. Morgan State: 2. Navy: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 15 by 80. Temple: 8 by 33.3. Rice: 6 by 35. UTEP: 2 by 23.3. Buffalo: 5 by 35.8. Lafayette: 3 by 12.5. North Texas: 12 by 80. Wake Forest: 9 by 67.5. Air Force: 12 by 60. Notre Dame: 6 by 30. Morgan State: 10 by 61.7. Navy: 9 by 57.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.6 · Games = 8 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 4 · -0.1 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
80 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | @ North Texas10+ tackles · Splash game | W 38-31 | 15 | 12 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/10 | vs NavySplash game | W 21-17 | 9 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Morgan State10+ tackles · Splash game | W 60-3 | 10 | 8 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Notre Dame | L 6-44 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Air Force10+ tackles | L 12-31 | 12 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Wake ForestSplash game | W 21-13 | 9 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas10+ tackles · Splash game | L 18-35 | 12 | 8 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Lafayette | W 62-7 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Buffalo | L 20-23 | 5 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTEP | W 66-14 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Rice | W 31-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Temple | W 28-13 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 3 | 20 | — | 3 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 1 | 20 | — | -2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 18.5 | 48 | 19.1 | 17.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 18.5 | 48 | 19.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 71.3 takeover score.
#2
North Texas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 68.9 takeover score.
#3
Wake Forest
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 67.1 takeover score.
#4
Ball State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Yale
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Army
18.5 primary output · 48 efficiency · 19.1 usage
57.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Army
57.4
18.5 primary · 48 efficiency · 19.1 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Army
45.4
3 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
7
Impact games
5
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
97
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jeremy Timpf
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.