Usage Score
14.1
Player Dossier
2014-2017Akron
QB • 6'1" • 224 lbs • Monroeville, PA, USA
Thomas Woodson is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
14.1
Efficiency
52.1
Consistency
76
Season Value
51.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Akron
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Thomas Woodson, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Akron. Thomas Woodson is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Thomas Woodson played QB for Akron. Across 4 tracked seasons, Thomas Woodson recorded 6,864 passing yards, 731 rushing yards, and 14 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Akron.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Akron paired 2,793 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 52.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with 280 yards of offense and 60.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
175.2
Efficiency
52.1
Usage
14.1
Consistency
76
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 59. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 182. Iowa State: 214. Troy: 251. Bowling Green: 192. Ball State: 212. Western Michigan: 124. Toledo: 197. Buffalo: 280. Toledo: 41
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 25 by 40.1. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 23 by 79.3. Iowa State: 48 by 50.6. Troy: 44 by 46.5. Bowling Green: 32 by 56.5. Ball State: 35 by 54.3. Western Michigan: 30 by 45.4. Toledo: 36 by 48.5. Buffalo: 32 by 60.2. Toledo: 16 by 39.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
79.3 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/2 | @ Toledo | L 28-45 | 5 | 14 | 35 | 35.7 | 0 | 1 | 39.5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Buffalo3+ TD | W 21-20 | 21 | 29 | 286 | 72.4 | 3 | 1 | 60.2 | 3 | -6 | -2 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Toledo | L 21-48 | 18 | 33 | 205 | 54.5 | 2 | 1 | 48.5 | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 10/15 | @ Western Michigan | W 14-13 | 13 | 24 | 127 | 54.2 | 1 | 1 | 45.4 | 6 | -3 | -0.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Ball State | W 31-3 | 17 | 30 | 211 | 56.7 | 2 | 0 | 54.3 | 5 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Bowling Green3+ TD | W 34-23 | 13 | 24 | 168 | 54.2 | 2 | 1 | 56.5 | 8 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Troy | L 17-22 | 20 | 40 | 268 | 50.0 | 1 | 2 | 46.5 | 4 | -17 | -4.30 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Iowa State | L 14-41 | 25 | 40 | 240 | 62.5 | 2 | 1 | 50.6 | 8 | -26 | -3.30 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff | W 52-3 | 15 | 21 | 166 | 71.4 | 1 | 0 | 79.3 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Penn State | L 0-52 | 12 | 23 | 71 | 52.2 | 0 | 1 | 40.1 | 2 | -12 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Akron
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Akron | 937 | 61.4 | 21.7 | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Akron | 2,793 | 60.5 | 27.7 | 1,856 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Akron | 2,793 | 60.5 | 27.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Akron | 2,113 | 55 | 17.7 | -680 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Akron | 1,752 | 52.1 | 14.1 | -361 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
312
Primary metric
312 total offense with 54.9 efficiency.
#2
Louisiana
331
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
331 total offense with 74.9 efficiency.
#3
VMI
420
Primary metric
Win with 420 yards of offense and 71.3 efficiency.
420 total offense with 71.3 efficiency.
#4
Eastern Michigan
291
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
291 total offense with 77.6 efficiency.
#5
Miami (OH)
291
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
291 total offense with 57.6 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Akron
2,793 primary output · 60.5 efficiency · 27.7 usage
67.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · Akron
67.9
2,793 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 27.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Akron
54.5
2,113 primary · 55 efficiency · 17.7 usage
10
250+ passing yards
7
300+ total offense
8
3+ TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8119
Gateway · Monroeville, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
7,595
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.