Usage Score
31.5
Player Dossier
2013-2016Washington
John Ross
WR • 5'11" • Long Beach, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
John Ross reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.3
Consistency
67.1
Season Value
66.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Washington
13131414151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Washington
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
John Ross, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Washington. John Ross reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Washington paired 1,150 primary output with 76.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Washington
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
82.1
Efficiency
76.3
Usage
31.5
Consistency
67.1
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 28. Rutgers: 90. Idaho: 67. Unknown: 10. Arizona: 28. Stanford: 82. Oregon: 94. Oregon State: 115. Utah: 48. California: 208. USC: 154. Arizona State: 95. Washington State: 80. Colorado: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 5 by 37.3. Rutgers: 5 by 100. Idaho: 7 by 63.8. Unknown: 1 by 66.7. Arizona: 4 by 46.7. Stanford: 4 by 100. Oregon: 9 by 69.6. Oregon State: 4 by 100. Utah: 4 by 80. California: 6 by 100. USC: 8 by 100. Arizona State: 12 by 52.8. Washington State: 8 by 66.7. Colorado: 4 by 85
Split Comparison
Wins87.1 · n=11 · -3.9 vs Losses
Losses91 · n=2 · +3.9 vs Wins
First Half57 · n=7 · -50.3 vs Second Half
Second Half107.3 · n=7 · +50.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Alabama | L 7-24 | — | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Colorado | W 41-10 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Washington StateHigh volume | W 45-17 | — | 8 | 80 | 11.7 | 10 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Arizona StateHigh volume | W 44-18 | — | 12 | 95 | 7.9 | 7.90 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs USC100 receiving yards · High volume | L 13-26 | — | 8 | 154 | 16.2 | 19.30 | 1 | 70 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ California100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 66-27 | — | 6 | 208 | 32.3 | 34.70 | 3 | 67 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Utah2+ TD | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 16 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Oregon State100 receiving yards | W 41-17 | — | 4 | 115 | 28.8 | 28.80 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ OregonHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 70-21 | — | 9 | 94 | 12 | 10.40 | 3 | 26 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Stanford | W 44-6 | — | 4 | 82 | 16.6 | 20.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Arizona | W 35-28 | — | 4 | 28 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Idaho2+ TD | W 59-14 | — | 7 | 67 | 7.9 | 9.60 | 2 | 12 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Rutgers2+ TD | W 48-13 | — | 5 | 90 | 18 | 18 | 2 | 50 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201320142014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Washington | 208 | 62 | 8.2 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Washington | 208 | 62 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Washington | 371 | 67 | 14.7 | 163 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Washington | 371 | 67 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | -371 |
| 2016 Postseason | Washington | 1,150 | 76.3 | 31.5 | 1,150 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Washington | 1,150 | 76.3 | 31.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
208
Primary metric
208 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
USC
154
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
California
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
57
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
California
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Washington
1,150 primary output · 76.3 efficiency · 31.5 usage
66.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Washington
66.8
1,150 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 31.5 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Washington
30.5
371 primary · 67 efficiency · 14.7 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9032
Jordan · Long Beach, CA
- Committed To
- Washington
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,729
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.