Usage Score
1.7
Player Dossier
2013-2016Vanderbilt
Landon Stokes
OLB • 6'4" • Orlando, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Landon Stokes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 7.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
7.9
Consistency
5.6
Season Value
6.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Vanderbilt
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Vanderbilt
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Landon Stokes, OLB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Vanderbilt. Landon Stokes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 7.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Vanderbilt paired 2 primary output with 7.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 7.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Vanderbilt
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
7.9
Usage
1.7
Consistency
5.6
Best Game by takeover score
NC State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. NC State: 0. South Carolina: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Western Kentucky: 1. Florida: 0. Kentucky: 0. Georgia: 0. Unknown: 1. Auburn: 0. Missouri: 0. Ole Miss: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 3 by 12.5. South Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 4.2. Georgia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Western Kentucky: 1 by 14.2. Florida: 1 by 4.2. Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Georgia: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Auburn: 0 by 0. Missouri: 1 by 4.2. Ole Miss: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.3 · Games = 4 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.2 · Games = 6 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 6 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
22.5 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/26 | vs NC State | L 17-41 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Ole Miss | W 38-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Missouri | L 17-26 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Auburn | L 16-23 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Georgia | W 17-16 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Kentucky | L 13-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Florida | L 6-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Western Kentucky | W 31-30 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Georgia Tech | L 7-38 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 47-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | vs South Carolina | L 10-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 2 | 7.9 | 1.7 | 2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 2 | 7.9 | 1.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.9 takeover score.
#2
Western Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.3 takeover score.
#3
NC State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.9 takeover score.
#4
Georgia Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.4 takeover score.
#5
Ole Miss
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Vanderbilt
2 primary output · 7.9 efficiency · 1.7 usage
6.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
6.9
2 primary · 7.9 efficiency · 1.7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8722
Lake Highland Prep · Orlando, FL
- Committed To
- Vanderbilt
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
18
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.