Usage Score
27.7
Player Dossier
2013-2017Louisiana Tech
RB • 5'6" • 203 lbs • Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Boston Scott leans balanced backfield option traits and 60 efficiency.
Usage Score
27.7
Efficiency
60
Consistency
77.1
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Boston Scott, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Louisiana Tech. Boston Scott leans balanced backfield option traits and 60 efficiency.
Boston Scott played RB for Louisiana Tech. Across 5 tracked seasons, Boston Scott recorded 1,833 rushing yards, 307 receiving yards, and 15 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Louisiana Tech.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Louisiana Tech paired 1,221 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
93.9
Efficiency
60
Usage
27.7
Consistency
77.1
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 103. Northwestern State: 110. Mississippi State: 104. Western Kentucky: 31. South Carolina: 27. South Alabama: 102. UAB: 71. Southern Miss: 106. Rice: 87. North Texas: 72. Florida Atlantic: 111. UTEP: 159. UTSA: 138
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 19 by 56.5. Northwestern State: 13 by 73.5. Mississippi State: 15 by 75. Western Kentucky: 9 by 37. South Carolina: 9 by 25.8. South Alabama: 8 by 100. UAB: 15 by 41.2. Southern Miss: 11 by 90.2. Rice: 17 by 53.3. North Texas: 18 by 41.7. Florida Atlantic: 24 by 47.9. UTEP: 24 by 65.7. UTSA: 20 by 71.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/21 | @ SMU100 rush yards | W 51-10 | 19 | 103 | 5.40 | 0 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sun 11/26 | vs UTSA100 rush yards | W 20-6 | 20 | 138 | 6.90 | 1 | — | — | 6.9 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ UTEP100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-21 | 22 | 134 | 6.10 | 0 | 2 | 25 | 6.6 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 23-48 | 19 | 87 | 4.60 | 1 | 5 | 24 | 4.6 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs North Texas | L 23-24 | 16 | 64 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Rice2+ TD | W 42-28 | 17 | 87 | 5.10 | 3 | — | — | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Southern Miss100 rush yards | L 27-34 | 11 | 106 | 9.60 | 1 | — | — | 9.6 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ UAB | L 22-23 | 14 | 48 | 3.40 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs South Alabama | W 34-16 | 6 | 76 | 12.70 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 12.8 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ South Carolina | L 16-17 | 8 | 17 | 2.10 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 3 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Western Kentucky | W 23-22 | 8 | 29 | 3.60 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Mississippi State | L 21-57 | 13 | 96 | 7.40 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6.9 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Northwestern State | W 52-24 | 9 | 55 | 6.10 | 0 | 4 | 55 | 8.5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Louisiana Tech
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 3 | 31.3 | 1.5 | 3 |
| 2015 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 276 | 58.5 | 7.3 | 273 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 276 | 58.5 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 640 | 56.4 | 10.5 | 364 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 640 | 56.4 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Louisiana Tech | 1,221 | 60 | 27.7 | 581 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 1,221 | 60 | 27.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with 148 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
148
Primary metric
148 scrimmage yards and 25.4 usage.
#2
Arkansas State
106
Primary metric
Win with 106 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
106 scrimmage yards and 6.5 usage.
#3
UTSA
138
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
138 scrimmage yards and 45.5 usage.
#4
UTEP
159
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
159 scrimmage yards and 37.5 usage.
#5
UTSA
107
Primary metric
Win with 107 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
107 scrimmage yards and 25.5 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
1,221 primary output · 60 efficiency · 27.7 usage
66.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
66.2
1,221 primary · 60 efficiency · 27.7 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Louisiana Tech
39.6
640 primary · 56.4 efficiency · 10.5 usage
6
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,140
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.