Usage Score
13.1
Player Dossier
2013-2017Rutgers
Kemoko Turay
DE • 6'5" • 252 lbs • Newark, NJ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kemoko Turay shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.8
Consistency
38.3
Season Value
46.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Rutgers
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kemoko Turay, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Rutgers. Kemoko Turay shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.8 disruption score.
Kemoko Turay played DE for Rutgers. Across 5 tracked seasons, Kemoko Turay recorded 63 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Rutgers.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 18 primary output with 35.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 35.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
35.8
Usage
13.1
Consistency
38.3
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 2.5. Eastern Michigan: 0. Morgan State: 0. Nebraska: 0. Ohio State: 3.5. Illinois: 1. Purdue: 4. Michigan: 2. Maryland: 1. Penn State: 1. Indiana: 0. Michigan State: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 5 by 45.8. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Nebraska: 8 by 33.3. Ohio State: 6 by 60. Illinois: 3 by 22.5. Purdue: 7 by 69.2. Michigan: 7 by 49.2. Maryland: 1 by 14.2. Penn State: 2 by 18.3. Indiana: 7 by 29.2. Michigan State: 10 by 71.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.5 · Games = 4 · +0 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 8 · +0 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
71.7 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Michigan State10+ tackles · Splash game | L 7-40 | 10 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Indiana | L 0-41 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Penn State | L 6-35 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Maryland | W 31-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ MichiganSplash game | L 14-35 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs PurdueSplash game | W 14-12 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Illinois | W 35-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Ohio StateSplash game | L 0-56 | 6 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Nebraska | L 17-27 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Morgan State | W 65-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 13-16 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs WashingtonSplash game | L 14-30 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 5 | 20.8 | 6.4 | 5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rutgers | 18 | 35.8 | 13.1 | 13 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.1 takeover score.
#2
Ohio State
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 59.3 takeover score.
#3
Michigan State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.6 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Rutgers
18 primary output · 35.8 efficiency · 13.1 usage
46.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
33.6
5 primary · 20.8 efficiency · 6.4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
7
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
63
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Kemoko Turay
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.