Usage Score
20.7
Player Dossier
2013-2015Arkansas
Hunter Henry
TE • 6'5" • Little Rock, AR, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Hunter Henry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.2
Consistency
62.7
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arkansas
1314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arkansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hunter Henry, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arkansas. Hunter Henry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Arkansas paired 739 primary output with 83.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Arkansas
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
56.8
Efficiency
83.2
Usage
20.7
Consistency
62.7
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 92. UTEP: 42. Toledo: 117. Texas Tech: 32. Texas A&M: 15. Tennessee: 62. Alabama: 18. Auburn: 68. Unknown: 55. Ole Miss: 60. LSU: 21. Mississippi State: 129. Missouri: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 5 by 100. UTEP: 2 by 100. Toledo: 8 by 97.5. Texas Tech: 4 by 53.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 33.3. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Alabama: 1 by 100. Auburn: 5 by 90.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 6 by 66.7. LSU: 3 by 46.7. Mississippi State: 7 by 100. Missouri: 2 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins53.3 · n=7 · -8.9 vs Losses
Losses62.2 · n=5 · +8.9 vs Wins
First Half54 · n=7 · -6.2 vs Second Half
Second Half60.2 · n=6 · +6.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Kansas State | W 45-23 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 0 | 43 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Missouri | W 28-3 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Mississippi State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 50-51 | — | 7 | 129 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 2 | 39 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ LSU | W 31-14 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Ole Miss | W 53-52 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 55 | 27.5 | 27.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Auburn | W 54-46 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Alabama | L 14-27 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Tennessee | W 24-20 | — | 3 | 62 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Texas A&M | L 21-28 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Texas Tech | L 24-35 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 12-16 | — | 8 | 117 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs UTEP | W 48-13 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 38 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Arkansas | 409 | 80.6 | 20.6 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Arkansas | 513 | 87.4 | 19.1 | 104 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arkansas | 513 | 87.4 | 19.1 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Arkansas | 739 | 83.2 | 20.7 | 226 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas | 739 | 83.2 | 20.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas A&M
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
129
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 97.5 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Arkansas
739 primary output · 83.2 efficiency · 20.7 usage
66.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Arkansas
66.7
739 primary · 83.2 efficiency · 20.7 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Arkansas
59.9
513 primary · 87.4 efficiency · 19.1 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9634
Pulaski Academy · Little Rock, AR
- Committed To
- Arkansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,661
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.