Usage Score
20.7
Player Dossier
2013-2015Arkansas
TE • 6'5" • Little Rock, AR, USA
Hunter Henry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.7
Efficiency
83.2
Consistency
62.7
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arkansas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hunter Henry, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Arkansas. Hunter Henry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Hunter Henry played TE for Arkansas. Across 3 tracked seasons, Hunter Henry recorded 1,661 receiving yards and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Arkansas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Arkansas paired 739 primary output with 83.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
56.8
Efficiency
83.2
Usage
20.7
Consistency
62.7
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 92. UTEP: 42. Toledo: 117. Texas Tech: 32. Texas A&M: 15. Tennessee: 62. Alabama: 18. Auburn: 68. Unknown: 55. Ole Miss: 60. LSU: 21. Mississippi State: 129. Missouri: 28
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 5 by 100. UTEP: 2 by 100. Toledo: 8 by 97.5. Texas Tech: 4 by 53.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 33.3. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Alabama: 1 by 100. Auburn: 5 by 90.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 6 by 66.7. LSU: 3 by 46.7. Mississippi State: 7 by 100. Missouri: 2 by 93.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Kansas State | W 45-23 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 0 | 43 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Missouri | W 28-3 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Mississippi State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 50-51 | — | 7 | 129 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 2 | 39 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ LSU | W 31-14 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Ole Miss | W 53-52 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 55 | 27.5 | 27.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Auburn | W 54-46 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Alabama | L 14-27 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Tennessee | W 24-20 | — | 3 | 62 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Texas A&M | L 21-28 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Texas Tech | L 24-35 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 12-16 | — | 8 | 117 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs UTEP | W 48-13 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 38 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arkansas
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Arkansas | 409 | 80.6 | 20.6 | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Arkansas | 513 | 87.4 | 19.1 | 104 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arkansas | 513 | 87.4 | 19.1 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Arkansas | 739 | 83.2 | 20.7 | 226 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas | 739 | 83.2 | 20.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas A&M
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
129
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 97.5 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Arkansas
739 primary output · 83.2 efficiency · 20.7 usage
66.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Arkansas
66.7
739 primary · 83.2 efficiency · 20.7 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Arkansas
59.9
513 primary · 87.4 efficiency · 19.1 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9634
Pulaski Academy · Little Rock, AR
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,661
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.