Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2013-2016Oklahoma State
S • 6'0" • Cibolo, TX, USA
Jordan Sterns shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.3
Efficiency
43.5
Consistency
50.2
Season Value
51
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Sterns, S. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Jordan Sterns shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.5 disruption score.
Jordan Sterns played S for Oklahoma State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jordan Sterns recorded 101 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Oklahoma State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 13 primary output with 43.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 43.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
43.5
Usage
10.3
Consistency
50.2
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado: 0.5. SE Louisiana: 0. Central Michigan: 4. Pittsburgh: 0. Baylor: 0. Texas: 1. Kansas: 1. West Virginia: 0. Kansas State: 1. Texas Tech: 2. TCU: 2. Oklahoma: 1.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado: 5 by 25.8. SE Louisiana: 2 by 8.3. Central Michigan: 8 by 73.3. Pittsburgh: 9 by 37.5. Baylor: 8 by 33.3. Texas: 12 by 60. Kansas: 4 by 26.7. West Virginia: 5 by 20.8. Kansas State: 12 by 60. Texas Tech: 8 by 53.3. TCU: 9 by 57.5. Oklahoma: 19 by 65
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
73.3 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | @ Colorado | W 38-8 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Oklahoma10+ tackles | L 20-38 | 19 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ TCUSplash game | W 31-6 | 9 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Texas TechSplash game | W 45-44 | 8 | 7 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Kansas State10+ tackles | W 43-37 | 12 | 12 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs West Virginia | W 37-20 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Kansas | W 44-20 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Texas10+ tackles | W 49-31 | 12 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Baylor | L 24-35 | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Pittsburgh | W 45-38 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Central MichiganSplash game | L 27-30 | 8 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs SE Louisiana | W 61-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 2 | 20 | — | 2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 13 | 43.5 | 10.3 | 11 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 13 | 43.5 | 10.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.2 takeover score.
#2
Baylor
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Iowa State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Oklahoma
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 39.9 takeover score.
#5
TCU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Oklahoma State
13 primary output · 43.5 efficiency · 10.3 usage
51
#2
2016 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
51
13 primary · 43.5 efficiency · 10.3 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
3
Impact games
3
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
101
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.