Usage Score
23.2
Player Dossier
2013-2017Bowling Green
Teo Redding
WR • 6'1" • 172 lbs • Warren, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Teo Redding reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.4
Consistency
39.9
Season Value
59.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
131415151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Teo Redding, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Teo Redding reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 423 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
56.7
Efficiency
75.4
Usage
23.2
Consistency
39.9
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 38. Unknown: 40. Northwestern: 34. Middle Tennessee: 71. Akron: 36. Miami (OH): 197. Ohio: 10. Kent State: 61. Buffalo: 39. Toledo: 78. Eastern Michigan: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 66.7. Northwestern: 4 by 56.7. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 94.7. Akron: 4 by 60. Miami (OH): 8 by 100. Ohio: 2 by 33.3. Kent State: 5 by 81.3. Buffalo: 7 by 37.1. Toledo: 3 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins129 · n=2 · +88.3 vs Losses
Losses40.8 · n=8 · -88.3 vs Wins
First Half69.3 · n=6 · +27.7 vs Second Half
Second Half41.6 · n=5 · -27.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 31-34 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 20 |
| Thu 11/16 | vs Toledo2+ TD | L 37-66 | — | 3 | 78 | 26 | 26 | 2 | 57 |
| Wed 11/8 | @ Buffalo | L 28-38 | — | 7 | 39 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 1 | 9 |
| Wed 11/1 | @ Kent State | W 44-16 | — | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Ohio | L 30-48 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-29 | — | 8 | 197 | 24.6 | 24.60 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Akron | L 23-34 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 13-24 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Northwestern | L 7-49 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Michigan State | L 10-35 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 59 | 45.8 | 5.8 | 59 |
| 2015 Postseason | Bowling Green | 222 | 77.9 | 6.2 | 163 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 222 | 77.9 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 423 | 86.3 | 13.4 | 201 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 624 | 75.4 | 23.2 | 201 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
197
Primary metric
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
423 primary output · 86.3 efficiency · 13.4 usage
59.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
59.2
624 primary · 75.4 efficiency · 23.2 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Bowling Green
43.6
222 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 6.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8363
Michigan Collegiate · Warren, MI
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,328
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.