Usage / Role
21%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2017Bowling Green
WR • 6'1" • 172 lbs • Warren, MI, USA
Teo Redding reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
21%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
72
High-end production for a receiver
Reliability
58
Useful contributor with volatile peaks
Star Power
80
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Player Story
Teo Redding built his college career from 2013 through 2017 as a wide receiver from Warren, MI wearing No. 9, spending time with Bowling Green. The clearest part of Teo Redding's career was his receiving role: 94...
Read the storyTeo Redding, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Teo Redding reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 5 | 5 | 59 | 0 | 25.2 |
| 2015 Postseason | Bowling Green | 8 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 47.4 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 8 | 12 | 198 | 3 | 47.4 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 12 | 31 | 423 | 3 | 67.4 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 11 | 45 | 624 | 8 | 73.2 |
Related Context
Teo Redding played WR for Bowling Green. Across 5 tracked seasons, Teo Redding recorded 1,328 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Bowling Green.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 624 primary output with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
56.7
Efficiency
75.4
Usage
23.2
Consistency
39.9
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 38. South Dakota: 40. Northwestern: 34. Middle Tennessee: 71. Akron: 36. Miami (OH): 197. Ohio: 10. Kent State: 61. Buffalo: 39. Toledo: 78. Eastern Michigan: 20
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 2 by 100. South Dakota: 4 by 66.7. Northwestern: 4 by 56.7. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 94.7. Akron: 4 by 60. Miami (OH): 8 by 100. Ohio: 2 by 33.3. Kent State: 5 by 81.3. Buffalo: 7 by 37.1. Toledo: 3 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 31-34 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 20 |
| Thu 11/16 | vs Toledo2+ TD | L 37-66 | — | 3 | 78 | 26 | 26 | 2 | 57 |
| Wed 11/8 | @ Buffalo | L 28-38 | — | 7 | 39 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 1 | 9 |
| Wed 11/1 | @ Kent State | W 44-16 | — | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Ohio | L 30-48 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-29 | — | 8 | 197 | 24.6 | 24.60 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Akron | L 23-34 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 13-24 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Northwestern | L 7-49 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs South Dakota | L 27-35 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Michigan State | L 10-35 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 31 |
Player Story
Teo Redding built his college career from 2013 through 2017 as a wide receiver from Warren, MI wearing No. 9, spending time with Bowling Green. The clearest part of Teo Redding's career was his receiving role: 94 catches, 1,328 receiving yards, and 14 touchdowns across 36 career games in the available record. His career also includes 2 tackles and 20 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Teo Redding's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 59 | 45.8 | 5.8 | 59 |
| 2015 Postseason | Bowling Green | 222 | 77.9 | 6.2 | 163 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 222 | 77.9 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 423 | 86.3 | 13.4 | 201 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 624 | 75.4 | 23.2 | 201 |
#1 Featured game
@ Miami (OH)
Week 6 · W 37-29 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
197
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Eastern Michigan
Week 5 · L 25-28 · Conference game
72
Receiving Yards
86 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Akron
Week 11 · W 38-28 · Conference game
40
Receiving Yards
78.5 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#4
@ Ohio
Week 6 · L 24-30 · Conference game
54
Receiving Yards
75.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
vs Akron
Week 7 · W 59-10 · Conference game
52
Receiving Yards
74.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
624 primary output · 75.4 efficiency · 23.2 usage
73.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
67.4
423 primary · 86.3 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Bowling Green
47.4
222 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 6.2 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.