Usage Score
44.6
Player Dossier
2013-2015Pittsburgh
Tyler Boyd
WR • 6'2" • Clairton, PA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Tyler Boyd reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.9
Consistency
77.7
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Pittsburgh
131314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Boyd, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Tyler Boyd reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 1,261 primary output with 91.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
77.2
Efficiency
68.9
Usage
44.6
Consistency
77.7
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 53. Akron: 95. Iowa: 131. Virginia Tech: 48. Virginia: 54. Georgia Tech: 68. Syracuse: 93. North Carolina: 89. Notre Dame: 84. Duke: 38. Louisville: 103. Miami: 70
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 6 by 58.9. Akron: 11 by 57.6. Iowa: 10 by 87.3. Virginia Tech: 5 by 64. Virginia: 7 by 51.4. Georgia Tech: 8 by 56.7. Syracuse: 12 by 51.7. North Carolina: 10 by 59.3. Notre Dame: 3 by 100. Duke: 3 by 84.4. Louisville: 11 by 62.4. Miami: 5 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins71.3 · n=7 · -14.1 vs Losses
Losses85.4 · n=5 · +14.1 vs Wins
First Half74.8 · n=6 · -4.7 vs Second Half
Second Half79.5 · n=6 · +4.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/28 | @ Navy | L 28-44 | — | 6 | 53 | 9.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Miami | L 24-29 | — | 5 | 70 | 14.6 | 14 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Louisville100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-34 | — | 11 | 103 | 10.2 | 9.40 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Duke | W 31-13 | — | 3 | 38 | 10.6 | 12.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Notre Dame | L 30-42 | — | 3 | 84 | 21 | 28 | 1 | 51 |
| Thu 10/29 | vs North CarolinaHigh volume | L 19-26 | — | 10 | 89 | 8.1 | 8.90 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ SyracuseHigh volume | W 23-20 | — | 12 | 93 | 7.1 | 7.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Georgia TechHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 31-28 | — | 8 | 68 | 7.2 | 8.50 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Virginia | W 26-19 | — | 7 | 54 | 7.6 | 7.70 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Virginia Tech | W 17-13 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ Iowa100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-27 | — | 10 | 131 | 11.5 | 13.10 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ AkronHigh volume | W 24-7 | — | 11 | 95 | 7.4 | 8.60 | 0 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 1,174 | 80.9 | 35.9 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,174 | 80.9 | 35.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 1,261 | 91.8 | 42.4 | 87 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,261 | 91.8 | 42.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 926 | 68.9 | 44.6 | -335 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 926 | 68.9 | 44.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
173
Primary metric
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa
153
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
North Carolina
160
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa
131
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 87.3 efficiency score.
#5
Duke
140
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Pittsburgh
1,261 primary output · 91.8 efficiency · 42.4 usage
75.1
#2
2014 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
75.1
1,261 primary · 91.8 efficiency · 42.4 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Pittsburgh
70.8
1,174 primary · 80.9 efficiency · 35.9 usage
Milestones
13
100+ receiving yards
15
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9418
Clairton · Clairton, PA
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,361
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.