Player Dossier

2013-2014

Auburn

Cameron Artis-Payne

RB • 5'11" • Harrisburg, PA, USA

Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover

Cameron Artis-Payne leans workhorse runner traits and 55.9 efficiency.

Usage Score

39.1

Efficiency

55.9

Consistency

78.4

Season Value

68.3

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Auburn

13131414

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
4
Program Path
Auburn
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Cameron Artis-Payne, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Postseason · Auburn. Cameron Artis-Payne leans workhorse runner traits and 55.9 efficiency.

Cameron Artis-Payne played RB for Auburn. Across 2 tracked seasons, Cameron Artis-Payne recorded 2,218 rushing yards, 151 receiving yards, and 19 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Auburn.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Auburn paired 1,755 primary output with 55.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Auburn

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

135

Efficiency

55.9

Usage

39.1

Consistency

78.4

Best Game by takeover score

Texas A&M

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 144. Arkansas: 191. San José State: 119. Kansas State: 94. Louisiana Tech: 128. LSU: 161. Mississippi State: 70. South Carolina: 167. Ole Miss: 138. Texas A&M: 218. Georgia: 105. Samford: 129. Alabama: 91

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 27 by 52.5. Arkansas: 27 by 72. San José State: 17 by 72.9. Kansas State: 24 by 34.2. Louisiana Tech: 23 by 56.1. LSU: 27 by 57.7. Mississippi State: 16 by 45.6. South Carolina: 25 by 69.6. Ole Miss: 27 by 53.2. Texas A&M: 31 by 75.3. Georgia: 21 by 47.7. Samford: 24 by 56. Alabama: 27 by 33.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins140.9 · Games = 8 · +15.3 vs Losses
Losses125.6 · Games = 5 · -15.3 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Scrimmage Yards

Top game by takeover score

Texas A&M

Best efficiency game

75.3 vs Texas A&M

Result
Thu 1/1@ Wisconsin100 rush yards · 2+ TDL 31-34261264.8021185.3
Sun 11/30@ AlabamaL 44-5525773.1002143.4
Sun 11/23vs Samford100 rush yardsW 31-7241295.4015.4
Sun 11/16@ GeorgiaL 7-3420864.3011195
Sat 11/8vs Texas A&M100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yardsL 38-41302217.4021-37.0
Sat 11/1@ Ole Miss100 rush yardsW 35-31271385.1015.1
Sat 10/25vs South Carolina100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yardsW 42-35251676.7016.7
Sat 10/11@ Mississippi StateL 23-3816704.4004.4
Sat 10/4vs LSU100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yardsW 41-7241265.3003356.0
Sat 9/27vs Louisiana Tech100 rush yardsW 45-17221165.3011125.6
Thu 9/18@ Kansas StateW 20-1422632.9002313.9
Sat 9/6vs San José State100 rush yards · 2+ TDW 59-131611273177
Sat 8/30vs Arkansas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yardsW 45-21261776.8011147.1

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Auburn

    2013-2014

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

2013201320142014
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2013 PostseasonAuburn61455.811.6
2013 Regular SeasonAuburn61455.811.60
2014 PostseasonAuburn1,75555.939.11,141
2014 Regular SeasonAuburn1,75555.939.10

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Texas A&M

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.

218

Primary metric

218 scrimmage yards and 42.5 usage.

#2

Western Carolina

133

Primary metric

Win with 133 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

133 scrimmage yards and 12.1 usage.

#3

Arkansas

191

Primary metric

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.

191 scrimmage yards and 42.2 usage.

#4

South Carolina

167

Primary metric

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.

167 scrimmage yards and 41.7 usage.

#5

LSU

161

Primary metric

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.

161 scrimmage yards and 40.9 usage.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2014 Postseason · Auburn

1,755 primary output · 55.9 efficiency · 39.1 usage

68.3

#2

2014 Regular Season · Auburn

68.3

1,755 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 39.1 usage

#3

2013 Postseason · Auburn

38.8

614 primary · 55.8 efficiency · 11.6 usage

Milestones

11

100+ rush yards

4

150+ scrimmage yards

3

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

1

Career teams

4

Seasons tracked

2,369

Career Scrimmage Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.